"Our broadswords are wonderful!" Sabers and broadswords of 1812

"Our broadswords are wonderful!" Sabers and broadswords of 1812
"Our broadswords are wonderful!" Sabers and broadswords of 1812

Video: "Our broadswords are wonderful!" Sabers and broadswords of 1812

Video:
Video: ЛЮБОВЬ С ДОСТАВКОЙ НА ДОМ (2020). Романтическая комедия. Хит 2024, November
Anonim
Image
Image

Soldiers, brave children, Where are your sisters?

Our sisters are lances, sabers are sharp, That's where our sisters are.

On the floor beneath him was a wide carpet covered with colorful arabesques; another Persian carpet hung on the wall opposite the windows, and on it were pistols, two Turkish rifles, Circassian checkers and daggers.

Weapon of 1812. As for edged weapons, then there is a special conversation. After all, its history had already been counted by the time of the outbreak of the war with Napoleon for … thousands of years, while the firearms - some miserable four centuries! Therefore, there is no wonder that in the Russian imperial army, as, indeed, in the army of Napoleon, and in all other armies of the world, edged weapons were in service with both the infantry and the cavalry, but only for the latter it was at that time the main one, and here in the infantry (we are, of course, not talking about rifle bayonets) it was auxiliary.

"Our broadswords are wonderful!" Sabers and broadswords of 1812
"Our broadswords are wonderful!" Sabers and broadswords of 1812

Well, we will begin the story about the melee weapons of the Russian infantry, as well as foot artillery and engineering troops from the officer's - the most beautiful and expensive. In 1812, it was an infantry sword model of 1798, which had a single-edged straight blade 86 cm long and 3.2 cm wide. Its total length was 97 cm, and its weight with the scabbard was 1.3 kg. Ephesus was wooden, but beautifully wrapped in twisted wire, had a metal pommel and a metal guard.

Image
Image

The privates and non-commissioned officers of the infantry, as a cold weapon, had a cleaver of the model of 1807 with a leather sheath, on a sling made of moose leather, which was worn over the right shoulder. Single-edged blade 61 cm long and 3.2 cm wide, cast brass hilt. Length 78 cm, weight 1.2 kg. A lanyard of braid with a brush was attached to the hilt. Moreover, the color of the braid mattered: it meant the company and the battalion, but the brush in the infantry was entirely white. In the engineering troops in 1812, a sapper cleaver of the 1797 model was used, which had a blade that was not straight, but curved, 50 cm long and up to 8.5 cm wide, the butt of which had a saw cut. Ephesus is a simple wooden handle with an iron cross with the ends bent to the point. It had a length of about 70 cm and a weight of up to 1.9 kg. The scabbard is made of wood, covered with black leather, with a metal device. It could be used both as a combat weapon and as a trenching tool.

Image
Image

Cossack troops in 1812 (except for the Cossacks of the guards regiments) were armed with sabers of an arbitrary design, which often passed from hand to hand by inheritance and still belonged to fathers and grandfathers. The most accessible for the Cossack was the light cavalry saber of 1809, well, it is clear that the Cossack families kept a lot of captured weapons: Asian, Hungarian, Polish sabers … The scabbard was used the simplest, wooden, leather-covered, with a copper or iron device.

Image
Image
Image
Image

In the Russian heavy cavalry in 1812, a sword was used as a combat melee weapon. Moreover, there were several types. So, the dragoons used the broadsword of 1806, again in a wooden sheath covered with leather and with a metal device. The blade of such a broadsword had a length of 89 cm, a width of up to 38 mm and a total length (with a hilt and in a sheath) 102 cm and a weight of 1.65 kg. But old samples of the end of the 18th century were also in use, and even "Caesar" (Austrian) broadswords, which in 1811 entered the dragoon regiments from the Moscow and Kiev arsenals.

Image
Image
Image
Image

The cuirassiers had two types of broadswords at once: army and guards, samples of 1798, cavalry in 1802 and 1810 with a metal scabbard and two rings for attaching harness belts. The sword blade of 1798 had a length of 90 cm, a width of about 4 cm and a guard with a cup, four protective bows and a pommel of the handle, designed in the form of a bird's head. The length of the broadsword was 107 cm, and the weight was 2.1 kg. So it was heavier than even any other medieval sword. The cuirassier broadsword of 1810 was longer: 111 cm (blade 97 cm) and the design of the hilt. The officer's broadsword was also provided. So, the officer's cuirassier broadsword of the 1810 model had a blade 91.5 cm long and a total length of 106.5 cm. The handle was not straight, but somewhat curved along the saber.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

The light cavalry of the era of the Napoleonic Wars used sabers from 1798 and 1809. The first had a wooden scabbard covered with leather, with a metal device that covered almost their entire surface, and the skin was visible only in the slots. The second could have a metal sheath. The total length of the saber was about one meter, with a blade length of 87 cm and a width of up to 4, 1 cm. The saber of the 1809 model by 1812 had almost supplanted the previous model. The length of her blade was 88 cm, width up to 3.6 cm with a reduced curvature of the blade. Weight - 1, 9 kg, total length - 107 cm. That is, this weapon was also not easy, and in order to wield such a saber well, considerable physical strength was required.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Pica, a cavalry weapon rooted in the depths of centuries, was also in service with the light cavalry of the Russian Empire in 1812-1814. The Cossacks were traditionally armed with pikes, but their size of the steel tip, and the length and diameter of the shafts were not regulated in any way. Whoever wanted with what lance, he fought with such a lance. But the differences from the army peaks among the Cossacks were very noticeable: the latter did not have veins at the tip and an inflow at the bottom of the shaft. In 1812, the pikes were in service with the cavalry regiments of the provincial militia, and often this was their only weapon.

Image
Image

As for the Lancers' cavalry, they received lances in 1806. It differed from the Cossack's with a long tip (12, 2 cm) and a blunt flow. The shaft was painted black and was thinner than that of the Cossacks. The average length was 2, 80-2, 85 m. The main difference between the lancers' peak was a cloth flag (weather vane), according to the color of which the regiment was determined, and inside the regiment itself - the battalion. During the attack, these weathercocks emitted a whistle and hum from the incoming air. They often write that while doing this they had a strong mental impact on the enemy. But … the thunder of cannon shots, rifle fire, stomping and neighing horses didn't drown him? So this is a rather controversial statement, especially when it comes to battlefields. Also, until the summer of 1812, the peaks of the Uhlan model, albeit without weathercocks, had the hussars of the first rank of eight regiments out of 12. In this regard, one can often come across statements that during the Patriotic War the Russian cavalry in this respect was superior to the cavalry of the Napoleonic army … But it is unlikely that the presence of the peak was already so decisive, otherwise they would have been armed with all the cavalry of Europe. While nowhere is it noted that it was the Uhlan cavalry that dominated the battlefield at that time. Although in the battle of Gutshtadt with Nadezhda Durova, the following incident occurred: “… I saw several enemy dragoons, who, having surrounded one Russian officer, shot him down from a horse with a pistol shot. He fell, and they wanted to chop him down. At that moment I rushed towards them, holding my lance at the ready. One must think that this extravagant courage frightened them, because at the same instant they left the officer and scattered apart. That is, the dragoons did not dare to contact the piquant Russian lancer, but decided to retreat, despite their numerical superiority. But what played the main role here - her peak or her courage (perhaps both), alas, can no longer be said.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

It is important to note that in the Russian army of that time, it was edged weapons that were used not only in battle, but also as a reward for officers. There are two types of such award weapons: "golden weapons" (swords and sabers with a gilded hilt) and Annenskoye (swords and sabers with the insignia of the Order of St. Anna, 3rd class). Since 1788, they have been awarded with golden swords and sabers with the inscription “For Bravery” on the shackle of the guard. Moreover, the headquarters and chief officers of the army and navy relied simply on weapons with an inscription and a gilded hilt, generals received swords and sabers with diamonds and the inscription: "For courage", but the commanders of armies or individual corps were awarded weapons in addition to diamonds, decorated with golden laurel wreaths, and the inscription made on them also contained the date and name of the battle site. Paul I canceled the awarding of such a weapon. However, by decree of November 18, 1796, it was stipulated that the order of St. Anna class 3 should be worn on the hilt of infantry swords and cavalry sabers of gentlemen officers.

Image
Image

Alexander I decided to resume the awarding of golden weapons, and by decree of September 28, 1807, he equated the officers awarded with golden weapons to the holders of Russian orders. In 1812, 274 people received golden swords and sabers, and 16 golden weapons with diamonds - 16. The most massive award of junior officers was the Annenskoe weapon, which in the same 1812 was awarded to 968 people. Interestingly, in the Napoleonic army, edged weapons were very similar to our Russian, with the only noticeable difference that the handles of the sapper hatchets of the guards sapper units were cast from brass and for some reason ended in a cock's head.

Image
Image

It can be concluded that in military-technical terms, the Russian and French armies were practically equal in all respects, therefore, the victory in the war of 1812 can be called associated to the greatest extent with factors of an economic and … psychological nature. The one who had more reserves and whose soldiers were braver, in the end, and should have won this war!

Recommended: