Myths about the origin of Ukraine and Ukrainians. Myth 1. Ukraine is the heir to Kievan Rus

Myths about the origin of Ukraine and Ukrainians. Myth 1. Ukraine is the heir to Kievan Rus
Myths about the origin of Ukraine and Ukrainians. Myth 1. Ukraine is the heir to Kievan Rus

Video: Myths about the origin of Ukraine and Ukrainians. Myth 1. Ukraine is the heir to Kievan Rus

Video: Myths about the origin of Ukraine and Ukrainians. Myth 1. Ukraine is the heir to Kievan Rus
Video: Ticonderoga-class Ship Brief 2024, December
Anonim

Modern Ukraine positions itself as a state with a very ancient history and even more ancient origins of the Ukrainian nation. The ideologists of this nation have their roots in the Trypillian culture, and according to the latest version, from the Sumerian civilization. At the same time, the Russian roots of the population living in this territory are completely denied.

Image
Image

All this looks ridiculous, but this historical nonsense, based on forgeries, myths, legends and mystifications of the history of the origin of Ukraine and its population, is hammered into the head of the younger generation. If you delve into the historical documents, it becomes clear that no "ancient Ukrainian nation" has ever existed. On these lands there has always lived one people, which from ancient times was called Russian - with its history, culture, victories and defeats.

Ukrainian historiography is silent about the Polish-Austrian project "Ukraine", aimed at splitting Russian unity, which is based on a monstrous lie about the age-old enmity of Russians and Ukrainians, the desire of "Muscovy" to conquer freedom-loving Cossacks, the European roots of the Ukrainian nation and the thousand-year history of this never existed the state.

Today in Ukraine lives one of the branches of the Russian people, which was called Little Russians, now Ukrainians. Here live the so-called ukry without clan and tribe, striving to justify their complexes with their hatred of the Russian people. God is their judge.

To reveal all this lies and hoaxes, in 2012, literally on our knees, we released a series of videos "500 seconds of the truth about Ukraine", in which we revealed the truth about the origin of the ancient ukry, the term "Ukraine", the Ukrainian language, the flag, coat of arms and anthem of Ukraine, about Judas Mazepa, sadist Bandera and many more myths of this premature state. He opens his eyes to the invented history of the "Ukrainian nation" built on forgery and hoaxes, oblivion of its past and glorification of traitors and traitors.

Videos made a lot of noise in the then Ukraine. Ukry even released their own series under the same name, but these were pathetic attempts to justify the false story, and after two episodes he died safely. When the number of views approached a million, and there were more than ninety thousand comments, the authorities (this is still under Yanukovych!) Achieved the removal of the series from the YouTube channel due to our plagiarism, however, they did not explain which one.

Taking into account the coming to power in Ukraine of the Nazi regime, which adopted the ideas and myths of the Ukrainian people, we decided to present the true story based on the materials of the series “500 seconds of the truth about Ukraine”.

Myth 1. Ukraine is the heir to Kievan Rus

The historiography of ukrov argues that modern Ukraine went from Kievan Rus on the grounds that they are geographically located on these lands. Dull hoaxers do not ask why, for example, modern Italy does not trace its roots from Ancient Rome? There is probably no historical basis for this.

We take historical documents. Starting from the 10th century, the indisputably historical chronicles "Russian Truth" and the 11th century "The Tale of Bygone Years" speak of Russia, the Russian land, and Prince Oleg, back in 882, ordered Kiev to be considered the "mother of Russian cities". Where is Ukraine here?

Move on. XI century - the heyday of Kievan Rus. Today everyone is inspired that this is ancient Ukraine, and the so-called Muscovy and Muscovites are a completely different people. We look at the map: Kiev, Chernigov, Novgorod, Rostov, Ryazan. From Lake Ladoga to the tributaries of the Dnieper. One people, a common history from the 9th century, speaks the same language, the Rurik dynasty rules everywhere. The whole world calls them dews, russians, russians, russians. There is no trace of any ukrov. Where is at least one document that this land was called Ukraine and ukry lived on it?

We open the 7th grade history textbook of Ukraine and we are surprised to learn that the ancient Ukrainian nation emerged 140 thousand years ago! Can you imagine such a thing? Homo sapiens will appear about 40 thousand years ago, and ukry has been beating mammoths for 100 thousand years!

Russian princes rule in Russia. But the Ukrov story divides them into friends and foes. So, Vladimir Monomakh is a Ukrainian prince, and his son Yuri Dolgoruky is the founder of Moscow, an accursed Muscovite. Monomakh's grandson Andrei Bogolyubsky is generally an enemy and a robber, his local nobility did not allow him to reign in Kiev, but he took and transferred the capital of Russia to Vladimir.

We go further - the XIII century. Mongol invasion of Russia, in 1240 they took Kiev by storm and destroyed it to the ground. In the southern Russian lands, desolation, life moves north to Vladimir and Moscow, where, at the hand of the Rurik people, over time, the Russian lands unite and the state is being revived.

Southern Russia - modern Ukraine, ceases to exist independently and for four centuries is considered only as a part of Polish and Lithuanian history.

The capital city Kiev, "the mother of Russian cities", in the XI century - one of the largest cities in Europe, where there were more than 400 churches, according to the description of the traveler Plano Carpini, was in 1246 an insignificant town of two hundred courtyards, for more than two centuries it lies in ruins, having survived only as one of the religious centers. And it was ruled in the second half of the XIII century by the governors of Vladimir, the Horde Baskaks and local princes, whose names are unknown in history.

The local nobility continues the division of power, so, 86 years before the Mongol invasion, 41 princes were replaced in Kiev. They ruled for a year or two, killed and expelled each other, ravaging the land in civil strife, which predetermined the fall of the princely dynasty.

The most enterprising, Daniil Galitsky, prince of Galician, instead of collecting Russian lands, decided to become king, in 1254 he received the royal title from the hands of the Pope of Rome and, as they say now, is being integrated into Europe. As a result, Galicia became a Polish province in 1392 and for almost 700 years (until 1939) loses contact with its relatives.

So a nation of traitors begins to emerge on these lands, striving to forget their ancient Russian roots, hating their relatives and ready to become the faithful slaves of European masters. Modern Galicia continues their work with dignity.

Fragmented, desolate and deprived of strength, southern Russia does not show any signs of the formation of statehood and is subdued by the Lithuanians practically without resistance. In 1321, the Kiev prince Sudislav recognized himself as a vassal of Lithuania, and in 1362 the Grand Duke of Lithuania Olgerd finally conquered all the southern Russian lands, which eventually came under the rule of Poland. In 1299, the residence of the metropolitan was transferred from Kiev to Vladimir, and then to Moscow, and once glorious Kiev was gradually reduced to the level of a district town.

In the confrontation with the enemies for the Russian lands, only northern Russia defended them. Ivan III takes the title of Sovereign of All Russia, unites the Russian lands and in 1480 expels the Horde.

So, Kievan Rus disappeared, no Ukraine appeared, and before the Pereyaslav Rada, the rule of the Lithuanian and Polish gentry was established on these lands. The South Russian nobility and the local Rurik people who led it betrayed their people. Among them were not found their own Alexander Nevsky and Dmitry Donskoy, there is not a single name worthy of respect and reverence, they did not remain in history. Traitors deservedly be forgotten by their descendants.

The nobility went over to the side of the enemies and, out of selfish motives, assimilated with the Lithuanian and Polish gentry. The South Russian people were left without their elite, the centuries-old fate of slaves and servants awaited them, the cities were desolate and the Polish-Lithuanian power reigned.

This period is unique in the Ukrov historiography. There is nothing to tell, sheer defeats and humiliations. In history, the names are only of the Lithuanian-Polish gentry and there is nothing Ukrainian.

After all, one so longs for a glorious history and great achievements! It couldn't be easier: let's invent a story for ourselves! Instead of the Rurik dynasty, at the behest of the mythmakers, the Ukrainian dynasty of the Olgerdovichs appears. The conquerors of southern Russia from the branch of the Grand Dukes of Lithuania - Olgerd, Vladimir, Olelka and Simeon, who ruled these lands and were at enmity with the Poles because of them, are declared "liberators" and supporters of the formation of Ukrainian statehood

To what baseness you can go to exalt your enslavers and oppressors before your descendants!

Further more. If you open a history textbook, you can find out that, it turns out, there were even Ukrainian princes. Who are they?

Czartoryski is the grandson of the Grand Duke of Lithuania Olgerd.

Zbarazhsky is a Polish nobleman, crown equestrian.

Ostrozhsky is the great Lithuanian hetman.

Vishnevetsky is a Polish prince of royal blood.

This is how the history of Ukraine is written after Kievan Rus. After the Mongol invasion in southern Russia, there are no Russians or Ukrainian princes and nobility, the land has become scarce with high-profile names. In the absence of their outstanding personalities, myths are created to justify the worthlessness and betrayal of the South Russian elite.

Only the Orthodox faith, reduced to the level of "Khlop", remained in the souls of the common people and priests who kept the traditions of their ancestors.

Virtually nothing remained of Kievan Rus on the lands of the Dnieper region, she went north to Vladimir and Moscow, in order to return in 400 years and revive the glorious traditions of the Russians.

What kind of continuity of modern Ukraine from ancient Kievan Rus can we talk about, if the entire spiritual, cultural and secular life of the ancient Russian state moved to northern Russia, which became the successor of Kievan Rus?

Recommended: