Taking into account the above facts, it is obvious that the traditional version of the "Tatar-Mongol" invasion, the yoke and more broadly - the creation of the empire of Genghis Khan, is a myth. Moreover, this myth is very beneficial to Russia's geopolitical "partners" both in the West and in the East. It allows you to sharply narrow the historical, chronological and territorial space of the Russian civilization and the super-ethnos of the Rus.
The time frame is usually limited by the first princes of the Rurik dynasty and the baptism of Russia (IX-X centuries). Although with the emergence of the theory of the state "Ukraine-Rus", when all the first centuries of the Russian state headed by the Rurikovich dynasty and all the first princes were "Ukrainized", Russian history was cut off right up to the addition of the "Old Russian nationality", the creation of Vladimir-Muscovite Rus. At the same time, the Russians were even deprived of the Slavic community - they are now the descendants of "Ugro-Finns, Turks, Mongols with an insignificant admixture of Slavic blood." And the "Ukrainians" were declared the "true" heirs of ancient Kievan Rus.
The territorial framework for the settlement of the super-ethnos of the Rus is limited to the area of the Dnieper region, the Pripyat bogs. From there, the Russians allegedly settled in the rest of the lands, displacing and assimilating the Finno-Ugrians, Balts and Turks. That is, everything is within the framework of the myth of the "prison of peoples", where the Russians allegedly conquered and oppressed neighboring tribes from ancient times.
Thus, the super-ethnos of the Rus was deprived of a multi-thousand-year history, coming from the Great Scythia and the legendary Hyperborea. And the territory of settlement of the Rus - from Europe in the west to the Pacific Ocean in the east, from the Arctic Ocean in the north to the borders of Iran, India and China in the south - was reduced to "Kievan Rus"
It is clear that some researchers saw the weak points of the official version of the "Tatar-Mongol" invasion. Trying to restore the true history, they went in several ways. The first attempt to give a different explanation of the events of the XIII century is the so-called. “Eurasianism” by G. Vernadsky, L. Gumilyov and others. Historians of this trend retain the traditional factual basis of the "Mongol" invasion, but carry out a complete ideological revision, where the minuses become pluses.
That is, the "Eurasians" did not question the origin of the "Mongols". But, in their opinion, the "Tatar-Mongols" were generally friendly to Russia and were with it as part of the Golden Horde in a state of idyllic "symbiosis". Generally sound facts are given about the positive influence of the power of Genghis Khan and the first rulers behind him on the vast Asian expanses. In particular, merchants could safely travel great distances without fear of robbers, they were destroyed; a perfectly organized postal service was created. North-Eastern Russia, with the support of Batu, withstood the fight against the western "knight-dogs". Later, Moscow became the new center of the "Eurasian empire", continuing the common cause.
The Eurasian version is useful in that it dealt a strong blow to the "armor" of classical history written by the Germans and Westerners for Russia. She showed the deception of the stereotype about the eternal enmity of the "forest" and "steppe", the incompatibility of the Slavic world with the cultures of the steppe Eurasia. Westerners ascribed the Slavic world to Europe. They say that the Slavs fell under the Horde yoke, and their history was subjected to harmful "distortions" from the "steppe". Like the "totalitarianism and tyranny" of the Mongol rulers. Moscow inherited the "Asian" traditions and attitudes of the Horde, instead of returning to the "European family."
The version of the "Tatar-Mongol yoke", which was proposed by the authors of the theory of a radical revision of history, the so-called. "New chronology" - AT Fomenko, GV Nosovsky and other authors. It must be said that the authors of the "new chronology" used the earlier ideas of the Russian scientist N. A. Morozov. “Fomenkivtsi” revised the traditional chronology towards its reduction, and believe that there is a system of historical doubles, when some events are repeated at another time and in another region. The "new chronology" caused a lot of noise in the historical and near-historical world. A whole world of "new chronology" has been created. In turn, the overthrowers wrote a whole bunch of exposing works.
According to Fomenko and Nosovsky, there was a single Russian-Horde Empire (Nosovsky G. V., Fomenko A. T. New chronology of Russia; Nosovsky G. V., Fomenko A. T. Russia and the Horde. Great Empire of the Middle Ages):
- The "Tatar-Mongol yoke" was simply a period of military rule in the Russian state. No foreigners conquered Russia. The supreme ruler was the commander - the khan-king, and in the cities there were civil governors - the princes who collected tribute for the upkeep of the army.
- The ancient Russian state was a single Eurasian empire, which included a permanent army - the Horde, which consisted of professional military personnel, and a civilian unit that did not have a permanent army. The notorious tribute (Horde exit), familiar to us from the traditional presentation of history, was simply a state tax within Russia for the maintenance of the regular army - the Horde. The famous "blood tribute" - every tenth person taken to the Horde - is a state military kit. Like conscription, but for life. Later, recruits were also taken away - for life. The so-called "Tatar raids" were the usual punitive expeditions-raids in those Russian regions where the local administration, the princes did not want to obey the tsar's will. It was not for nothing that Alexander Nevsky so rigidly established control of the Horde in the Novgorod-Pskov land. For him, the unity of the state was an obvious necessity in the face of an invasion from the West. Russian regular troops punished the rebels, as they would later do in other periods of history.
- “Tatar-Mongol invasion” is an internal war of Russians, Cossacks and Tatars within the framework of one single empire. The Golden Horde and Russia were part of the great power "Great Tartary", which was predominantly inhabited by Russians. Great Russia ("Tartary") was split into two fronts, into two rival dynasties - the western and eastern, and the eastern Russian Horde and were those "Tatar-Mongols" who took, stormed the cities of Vladimir-Suzdal, Kiev and Galician Rus. This event went down in history as the "invasion of the nasty", the "Tatar yoke".
- The Russian-Horde Empire existed from the 14th century to the beginning of the 17th century, and its era ended in great turmoil. As a result of the turmoil, which was initiated in Rome with the help of a part of the Russian "elite", the pro-Western Romanov dynasty came to power. She purged the sources, caused a split in the church with the emasculation of Orthodoxy, when religion became a formality and one of the instruments of control of the people. Under the Romanovs, Russia (except for some periods when Russia was headed by patriotic emperors) set out to "restore" unity with the West. However, this course contradicted the "Russian matrix" - the cultural code of the Russian superethnos. As a result, the lack of unity of the "elite" with the people led to a new turmoil - the catastrophe of 1917.
The Romanovs, in order to retain and maintain power, as well as to pursue a pro-Western course, needed a new history that would ideologically justify their power. The new dynasty from the point of view of the previous Russian history was illegal, so it was necessary to radically change the coverage of the previous Russian history. This is what the Germans did. They "wrote" a new history of Russia, removing facts that contradicted the new order and cutting off Russian history in the interests of the West and the new authorities. Professionals worked, without changing the facts in essence, they were able to distort the entire Russian history beyond recognition. The history of Russia-Horde with its class of farmers and military class (horde) was declared the era of "foreign conquest", "Tatar-Mongol yoke". At the same time, the Russian army (horde) turned into mythical aliens from a distant unknown country.
The famous writer Vasily Golovachev adheres to the same version: “Here we have been told all our lives: the Tatar-Mongol yoke, the Tatar-Mongol yoke, implying that Russia was in slavery for many centuries, not having its own culture, its own written language. What nonsense! There was no Tatar-Mongol yoke! Ygo in general from Old Slavic - "rule"! The words "army" and "warrior" are not originally Russian, they are Church Slavonic and were introduced into use in the seventeenth century instead of the words "horde" and "horde". Before the forcible baptism, Russia was not pagan, but Vedic or, rather, Vestic, she lived according to the traditions of Vesta, not religion, but the most ancient system of universal knowledge. Russia was a Great Empire, and the views of German historians about the supposedly slave past of Russia, about the slave souls of its people were imposed on us … A conspiracy against true Russian history has existed and is still in effect., and we are talking about the most heinous distortion of the history of our fatherland to please those who are interested in hiding the secrets of the accession to the throne of the Romanov dynasty, and most importantly - in the humiliation of the Russian clan, supposedly a clan of slaves who groaned under the unbearable burden of the three-hundred-year Tatar-Mongol yoke, who did not have their own culture. … There was a great Russian-Horde empire, ruled by a Cossack chieftain - dad, - hence, by the way, the nickname - Batu, - spread over a territory larger than the former USSR. Is this not a reason for the Pharisees who lived in America and Europe to imagine that everything was the other way around, that it was not they who occupied the leading position, but the Slavs?"
The "new chronology" of Fomenko and Nosovsky raises many questions and is, apparently, erroneous. But the main thing is that the "Fomenkovites" in their writings published a large number of traces of the presence of Russian-Rus in Europe and throughout Eurasia. Although according to the "classical" version of history, the Eastern Slavs (Russians) got out of the swamps and forests only somewhere in the period of the 5th-6th centuries. (others give an even later date), their statehood was created by the "Vikings-Swedes", and the Russians allegedly have nothing to do with the "real history" that went on in Europe and Asia.
True, having found numerous traces of the presence of Russians in Europe and Asia, where they should not officially be, Fomenko and Nosovsky made a strange conclusion: the Russians, together with the Cossacks and Turks during the reign of Ivan III, conquered Europe and ruled it for a long time. Europe was part of the Russian Empire. Then, gradually, the Russians were ousted from Europe, and they tried to destroy their traces so that there was no doubt about the greatness of European civilization.
Here we can agree with the last conclusion: the Vatican, later Masonic orders and lodges really did everything to destroy the traces of the Slavs, Rus in Europe, and also write the "history" of Rus-Russia in their own interests. But this could not be done completely, since the Russians were not short-term invaders of Europe, as it seems to the supporters of the "new chronology". There was no conquest of Europe, The Rus were the autochthonous (indigenous) population of Europe, as they lived in Europe since ancient times. Our ancestors - the Wends, the Veneti, the Veins, the Vandals, the ravens-ravens, the Rugi-rarogs, the Pelasgians, the Rasens, etc. - lived in Europe since ancient times.
This is confirmed by most of the toponymy of Europe (the names of rivers, lakes, localities, mountains, cities, settlements, etc.). The Rus have inhabited the expanses of the Balkans since ancient times, including Greece-Goretia and Crete-Lurker, modern Poland, Hungary, Austria, Germany, Denmark, Northern France, Northern Italy, Scandinavia. The process of their physical destruction, assimilation, Christianization, and displacement from Europe began around the middle of the 1st millennium AD. NS. It was the Slavic-Russian tribes that completely crushed the late rotten Rome (the "Germanic" tribes, which are counted among the Germans, have nothing to do with them, for example, the "Germans" -Vandals are the Slavs-Wends). But the flag of the "Roman infection" was already picked up by Western Christian Rome and the Romeian (Byzantine) Empire, a protracted war began, which went on for a thousand years (and continues to this day, since the "Russian question" has not yet been resolved). The Slavic Russians were destroyed, turned into "German-dumb", who were thrown at the brothers, who had not yet forgotten their language and family, and were pushed to the east. A significant part of them was destroyed or assimilated, turning into "Germans", included in the new Romanesque and German-Scandinavian peoples. So, the whole Slavic civilization in the center of Europe was destroyed - Western (Varangian) Russia. You can read about this in the work of L. Prozorov "Varangian Russia: Slavic Atlantis" or the work of Yu. D. Petukhov "The Normans. Rus of the North ".
Other Slav-Russians were inoculated with the virus of Catholicism, the Slavs were subordinated to the Western matrix, making their brothers enemies. In particular, in this way, they turned the Poles-glades into stubborn enemies of Russia. Now, according to the same scheme, the southern and western parts of the super-ethnos of the Rus are being turned into "Ukrov-Orcs". In Belarus, Russians are made into "Litvin". In Russia itself, Russians are turned into an ethnographic mass, and a biomaterial - “Russians”.
Thus, the positivity of the "new chronology" is that it shows the absence of "Mongols from Mongolia" in the vastness of Russia. It proves the fact that the true history of Russia is largely cut off, distorted to please the masters of the West
The third version is offered by supporters of the idea that Russian civilization and the super-ethnos of the Rus have always existed, often creating great (world powers), and within the borders of Northern Eurasia. Northern Eurasia has been inhabited since ancient times by our ancestors, the Rus, whom the sources know under different names - Hyperboreans, Aryans, Scythians, Tavro-Scythians, Sarmatians, Roxolans-Rossolans, Varangians-Wends, Dew-Rusichi, “Moguls” (“powerful”), etc.
So, in the work of N. I. Vasilieva, Yu. D. Petukhov "Russian Scythia" it is noted that on the territory of Northern Eurasia - from the Pacific Ocean and the borders of China to the Carpathians and the Black Sea, anthropological, cultural (spiritual and material culture), often political unity can be traced from the Neolithic and Bronze Age (the time of the Proto-Indo-Europeans, Aryans) to the Middle Ages.
There are facts suggesting that our direct ancestors lived on the territory of modern Russia-Russia from the very appearance of a modern type of man - a Cro-Magnon-Caucasian. So, a group of scientists from Russia and Germany, after many years of research, came to the conclusion that it was the Russian land that was the cradle of European civilization. The results of the latest research have proved that a person of the modern Caucasian type arose by the 50-40th millennium BC. and originally lived exclusively within the Russian Plain, and only then settled throughout Europe.
According to the British BBC radio, scientists made such conclusions after examining a human skeleton discovered in 1954 near Voronezh in the ancient burial place of Markina Gora (Kostenki XIV). It turned out that the genetic code of this man, buried about 28 thousand years ago, corresponds to the genetic code of modern Europeans. To date, the complex "Kostenki" near Voronezh is recognized by world archaeologists as the most ancient habitat of a modern type of man, a Caucasian. Thus, the modern territory of Russia was the cradle of European civilization.
According to Yu. D. Petukhov, the author of a number of fundamental studies on the history of the Rus ("History of the Rus", "Antiquity of the Rus", "By the Roads of the Gods", etc.), vast forest-steppe areas from the Northern Black Sea region through the Southern Urals and to Southern Siberia, modern Mongolia, which were given to the "Mongol-Tatars" by Western historians, in the XII-XIV centuries. actually belonged to the so-called. "To the Scythian Siberian world." Caucasians mastered vast areas from the Carpathians to the Pacific Ocean even before the departure of the wave of Aryan-Indo-Europeans in 2 thousand BC. NS. to Iran and India. The memory of the tall, fair-haired and light-eyed warriors has survived both in China and in neighboring regions. The military elite, the nobility of Transbaikalia, Khakassia and Mongolia were Caucasian-Indo-Europeans. It was from here that a legend arose and the light-brown-bearded and blue-eyed (green-eyed) Genghis Khan-Temuchin, the European appearance of Batu, etc. It was these heirs of the great northern civilization - Scythia, who were the only real military force that could conquer China, Central Asia into their sphere of influence), the Caucasus, Russia and other regions. Later they were dissolved among the Mongoloids and Turks, giving a passionate impulse to the Turks, but retained their memory as of fair-haired and light-eyed "giants" (for physically less developed Mongoloids, they were giant heroes, like the Rus of Kiev, Chernigov and Novgorod for the travelers).
The relatively rapid assimilation (within the framework of the historical process - only a few centuries) of the Horde's Rus should not be surprising. Thus, the northern Caucasians more than once invaded China (they do not like to remember this in the Celestial Empire), but they all disappeared into the mass of Mongoloids, their subjects. Also, after the catastrophe of 1917, thousands and tens of thousands of Russians ended up in China. Where are they? They should have made up a significant part of modern Chinese society. However, they were assimilated. Already in the second, third generation, everyone became "Chinese". Lost not only racial, but also linguistic, cultural, differences. Only in India, the descendants of the Indo-European Aryans (our brothers) were able to preserve their appearance, cultural traditions (Old Russian language - Sanskrit) in the huge mass of the "black" population, thanks to a rigid caste system. Therefore, the modern castes of Kshatriya warriors and brahmana priests are very different from the rest of the Indian population.
The Horde did not adhere to the principles of caste division, therefore the Horde in China and other areas that the Mongoloids mastered, dissolved, passing on some of their characteristics and passionary charge to the Mongoloids and Turks.
Some of these Scythian-Rus came to Russia. Anthropologically and genetically, these late Scythians were the same Rus as the Rus who lived in Ryazan, Novgorod, Vladimir or Kiev. Outwardly, they were distinguished by the manner of dressing - the "Scythian animal style", their own dialect of the Russian language, and the fact that they were, for the most part, pagans. Therefore, the chroniclers called them "filthy", that is, pagans. This is the key to the phenomenon that the three-century "Mongol" yoke did not introduce the slightest anthropological changes in the indigenous population of Russia. Therefore, the Scythian-Rus of the Horde (the word "horde" is a distorted Russian word "clan", "glad", preserved in German as "order, ordnung") quickly found a common language with most of the Russian princes, became related, fraternized. It is doubtful that in the same way the Russians would begin to establish relations with absolute strangers, Mongoloids.
The cities of the Scythians and their neighbors that existed before the new era (according to I. E. Koltsov). 1 - Dnieper Scythians; 2 - neurons; 3 - agathirs; 4 - androphages; 5 - melanchlens; 6 - gelons; 7 - boudins; 8 - Sarmatians; 9 - brands; 10 - tissagets; 11 - irks; 12 - breakaway Scythians; 13 - argippaeus; 14 - Issedons; 15 - arimasp; 16 - Hyperboreans; 17 - ancestors of the Kalmyks; 18 - Massagets; 19 - royal Scythians; 20 - Yenisei Scythians; 21 - Scythians of Indigir; 22 - Trans-Volga Scythians; 23 - Volga-Don Scythians.
Scythian swastikas-solstice
This version immediately puts in place many pieces of the mosaic that do not find their place in the traditional version. Siberian Scythians-Rus had a multi-thousand-year developed spiritual and material culture, production base, military traditions (similar to the later Cossacks) and could form an army capable of crushing China and reaching the Adriatic Sea. The invasion of the Scythian-Siberian pagan Rus drew into its mighty wave of pagan Türks, pagan Polovtsians and Alans. Subsequently, the Siberian Rus created the Great "Mongol" empire, which began to degenerate and degrade only after the growing Islamization, which was facilitated by the influx of a significant number of Arabs into the Golden (White) Horde. Islamization became the main prerequisite for the death of a powerful empire. It collapsed into many debris, among which Moscow Russia began to rise, which will restore the empire. After the battle on the Kulikovo field, Moscow gradually came to the fore as the capital of the new Russian empire. In about a century and a half, the new center will be able to restore the main core of the empire.
Thus, the Russian state in the 16th-19th centuries did not conquer foreign lands, but returned to its composition the territories that had been part of the northern civilization since ancient times.
Therefore, it is not surprising that the 16th-17th centuries, and sometimes up to the 18th century, most of Eurasia in Europe was called Great Scythia (Sarmatia) or Great Tartaria-Tartary. The origins of that time identified the ancient Scythians-Sarmatians and contemporary Russian-Slavs, believing that the entire forest-steppe Eurasia, as before, was inhabited by one people. This was the opinion not only of authors who used literary sources, but also of travelers. Roman humanist of the 15th century Julius Let made a trip to "Scythia", visited Poland, on the Dnieper, at the mouth of the Don and described the life and customs of the "Scythians". The traveler talked about the "Scythian" honeys and braga, about how the "Scythians", sitting at oak tables, proclaim toasts in honor of the guests, wrote down a few words (they turned out to be Slavic). He said that "Scythia" extends to the borders of India, where the "khan of the Asian Scythians" rules.
The Arabian (Egyptian) historian of the middle of the XIV century Al-Omari, reporting about the "lands of Siberia and Chulymansky", reports a severe cold and the fact that beautiful, remarkably built people with whiteness of face and blue eyes live there. In China, under the rule of the Yuan dynasty (1260-1360s), a guard recruited from Yases, Alans and Russians was of great importance in the capital. Some names of "Alan" commanders are also known - Nikolay, Ilie-bagatur, Yuvashi, Arselan, Kurdzhi (George), Dmitry. The renowned commander "Hundred-eyed" Bayan bore a Slavic pagan name. In 1330, Emperor Wen-tszong (great-grandson of Kubilai) created a Russian formation of 10 thousand soldiers - translated from Chinese into Russian, its name sounds like "The Ever-Faithful Russian Guard." Considering the fact that by the middle of the 14th century the former united "Mongol" empire collapsed, it is difficult to imagine that thousands of Russian soldiers took to China from Vladimir-Moscow Russia. Most likely, they were from closer places. Thus, the Chinese Wang Hoi and Yu Tang-Jia, who lived in the XIV century, wrote: "The Russians are the descendants of the ancient Usun people." And the Usuns are the Siberian Scythians, who were called Issedons in ancient Europe (they occupied the territories of the Southern Urals and Siberia).
The Russian historical tradition, prior to outside interference, directly traced the origin of the Russian people to the Alans-Sarmatians. The author of the "Scythian history" A. Lyzlov identified the Sarmatians-Savromats with the Russians. In the "History" of V. N. Tatishchev and M. Lomonosov it is reported that the Russians descended from the Sarmatians-Roxalans (Eastern Rus), on the one hand, and from the Vendian-Wends (Western Slavonic), on the other.
Thus, it is clear that practically the entire history of Western Europe is a myth. The winners, that is, the masters of the West, simply ordered the story for themselves, they tried to clean up or hide unnecessary pages. But we do not need their myth, we cannot build our power on other people's tales. We need our own, Russian history, which will help preserve our civilization and the Russian race.
