The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke

Table of contents:

The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke
The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke

Video: The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke

Video: The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke
Video: Delivering Food In Stalingrad 2024, April
Anonim
The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke
The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke

Secrets of the ancient Rus. The term "Tatar-Mongols" is not in the Russian chronicles, neither VN Tatishchev, nor NM Karamzin and other historians, founding fathers of the Russian historical school, have it. "Mongols" are the Rus of the Scythian world, the most powerful and great people of Northern Eurasia from the Urals to the Pacific Ocean. The "Mongols" were Indo-European Aryans, not Mongoloids. The myth of the "Mongol-Tatar yoke" was invented in the Vatican to distort the true history of Russia and the Rus (Russian people).

The problem of "Tatar-Mongols"

The term "Mongol-Tatars" is artificial, invented, it is not in Russian sources, the first Russian historians do not have it. The term "Mongol-Tatars" itself is not a self-name or an ethnonym of the peoples of Mongolia (Khalkha, Oirats). This is an artificial term, which was first introduced by P. Naumov in 1823 in the article "On the attitude of Russian princes to the Mongol and Tatar khans from 1224 to 1480".

Some researchers deduce the term "Mongols" from the Chinese characters "men-gu" - to receive ancient. " Obviously, this is absurdity, nonsense. In reality, the "Mongols", in the original version, without the nasal "n", "Mughals" (in India they were called that), comes from the Cornish word "could, can" - "mozh, husband, mighty, mighty, mighty" (that who “can”, “mighty”, hence “mighty”), and the plural ending “-ola” (for example, “voguls”). It is from the "mighty, powerful" that the "Mongols" appeared as "great". The people who created the greatest empire in Eurasia.

The only people who could build such a world power were the Rus of the Scythian Siberian world. The most powerful ethnos of the vast forest-steppe zone of Eurasia from the southern Russian steppes, the Urals to the Pacific Ocean. Only they can be called “great”, “powerful”, “Mughal Mongols”. Other ethnic groups and tribes could not claim such a title. More information about the Rus of Eurasia can be found in the following works: Yu. D. Petukhov, “The Rus of Eurasia”; N. I. Vasilieva, Yu. D. Petukhov, "Russian Scythia".

It is also known that before the beginning of the XII century. n. NS. Mongols and Tatars were at enmity. And this is not surprising. Mughal Mongols are Indo-Europeans (Aryans), and Tatars are Turks. From the "Secret Legend" it is known that the Mughals (Siberian Rus) hated the Tatars (steppe Turks). For some period Temuchin (Genghis Khan) "tortured" the Tatars, included them in his super-union of tribes. And then, for disobedience and the possibility of betrayal, he ordered everyone to be cut down: all men above the axis of the cart, women and children were distributed by birth, for assimilation. The word "Tatar" in that era was an insult to the Mughals. Therefore, the term "Mongol-Tatars" is purely an armchair term.

Much later, the ethnonym "Tatars" began to call the Volga Bulgars, then other fragments of the Golden Horde - Astrakhan, Crimean Tatars, etc. Although the ethnonym "Bulgar" comes from "Volgar". That is, the “Volga Bulgars-Volgars” is an obvious tautology. "Volgari" belong to the group of intermediate genera, with a large original Indo-European component. The division of the Boreals into Indo-Europeans and Pro-Türks occurred in the Southern Urals in the 3rd - early 2nd millennium BC. NS. Some of the intermediate clans, in the predominance of the Indo-European part, settled on the Volga, becoming the "Volgars" -Bulgars. The original Türks, including the Tatars, who inherited from Temuchin, lived to the east and south. At the same time, the Siberian Rus, having reached the Bulgarians, did not begin to cut out all the "Volgars", although they showed strong resistance. Bulgars for the most part, after the elimination of the hostile nobility (Islamized), were adopted into the clan-hordes of the "Mongols". They had the same initial spiritual and material traditions, the same language (a dialect of the common language of the Rus, as now Little Russian-Ukrainian is the dialect of the common Russian language) as the Siberian Rus-Mongols. Therefore, the clans of the Bulgars were easily integrated into the general imperial North Eurasian tradition, and in the future the Kazan "Tatars" became the most active builders of the common Russian state-empire, part of the Russian superethnos.

Thus, the Big, "Mongolian" Horde is the Scythian-Siberian-Volga clans of the pagan Rus (including the Polovtsians and Alans). The Horde is the direct heir of Great Scythia and Sarmatia, the ancient northern tradition and civilization of the Indo-European Aryans. The Rus at the peak of their power controlled Northern Eurasia, developed the southern civilizations of Asia - Persian, Indian, Chinese and Japanese (it is interesting that there, in particular in India, as in a "reserve", many traditions of the Rus of Eurasia were preserved, which our enemies could erase in the north). There were simply no other "Mongol-Mongoloids" who had a developed multi-thousand-year spiritual and material culture, production necessary to equip powerful armies, a military cult capable of great campaigns and conquests in Northern Eurasia.

The myth of the Tatar-Mongol yoke

The truth is that there are no "Mongol-Mongoloids" from Mongolia in Russia in the 13th - 15th centuries. did not have. Today's Mongols are Mongoloids. And archaeologists did not find the skulls of the Mongoloids in Ryazan, Vladimir-Suzdal or Kievan Rus. There are no signs of Mongoloidism among the Russians either. Although with a large-scale invasion of tens of thousands of warriors, there should be such signs for a prolonged "yoke". If those innumerable tumens-darkness passed through Russia and the Mongols drove many thousands of Russian women into their camps, and then dominated the Russian lands for a long time, then the anthropological Mongoloid material would certainly remain. Because Mongoloid is dominant, overwhelming. It was enough for thousands of Mongols to rape thousands of Russian women and Russian burial grounds for many generations would be filled with Mongoloids.

So, the Polish historians-Russophobes, and after them the Ukrainian ones, have long come up with a theory about the Russian-“Asians”. They say that there is no Slavism left in the Muscovites, the Russians are a mixture of Mongols and Finno-Ugrians. And the real descendants of the Kiev Rus are Ukrainians. However, genetics shows that Russians-Russians do not have signs of Mongoloid, Russians are Caucasians. In the Russian burial grounds of the "Horde" times there are only Caucasian Rus. Mongoloidism appeared in Russia only in the 16th - 17th centuries. instead of serving the Tatars, who en masse entered the service of the Russian tsars and themselves, being originally Caucasians, acquired Mongoloid features on the eastern borders of Russia, marrying native women.

Thus, all these tales and tales about narrow-eyed horsemen, iron archers who conquered a significant part of Eurasia are a myth. It was invented in the West to distort the true history of Russia, Europe and mankind. Russian history was drastically cut off, almost before Epiphany, and rewritten in the interests of Rome and its heirs. The Russians were turned into a "wild" tribe that did not know writing and barely crawled out of the swamps in the middle of the 1st millennium AD. NS. Savage barbarians, to whom statehood, civilization, culture and writing were instilled by the Viking Germans and Greek missionaries.

Wandering monks, missionaries (Catholic intelligence) wrote reports to the "control center" (Vatican). They wrote in them everything they knew or invented, confused them, brought in popular rumors. On the basis of these reports, the "history of the great Mongols" has already been written. These "stories" came from the West to the East, to Russia already as an immutable truth. Under the Romanovs, German historians wrote "the history of Russia" in the political interests of Europe. This is how the great myth of the great "Mongols from Mongolia" was born. Novels, pictures were written, films began to be made, how Mongolian tumens from Mongolia came to Russia and Europe. Now it has come to the point that in the films "Mongols" are shown as real "Chinese" - the Russian fantasy thriller "The Legend of Kolovrat" (2017). Although even in Europe on engravings "Mongols" are depicted as Russian Cossacks, boyars and archers.

Lack of potential to create a "Mongol" empire

Mongolia still lacks the spiritual, industrial and human potential to create a world empire. There is no great military culture, like the Russians-Russians, or the Japanese and Germans. In the XII century. The Mongol steppe could not expose the numerous, well-armed, disciplined and high fighting spirits of the army of conquerors, going "to the last sea." Mongolia simply could not conquer such developed and strong powers - China, Central Asia (Khorezm), Russia, half of Europe, Persia, etc.

This is complete nonsense. In the then Mongolia there was simply no developed production, material culture to arm many thousands of soldiers. There was no developed production, crafts, wild steppe dwellers and hunters could not become blacksmiths-metallurgists, builders, engineers, great warriors within one generation. Iron discipline and military spirit cannot be instilled in wild camps, something millions of blacks with AK do not conquer the planet. The organization of the army of "Mongols" is typically Indo-European, Russian - in decimal. Darkness - 10 thousand warriors, one thousand, one hundred and ten. The level of spiritual and material culture of Mongoloid clans of Mongolia in the XII-XIII centuries. approximately corresponded to the culture of the Indian tribes of the Great Lakes of the 17th century. They just started to master cattle breeding, they were hunters. At this level of development, one cannot conquer half the world, build a powerful empire.

Wars of the Rus with the Rus

Therefore, we must forget about the "Mongols from Mongolia". They weren't there. But there were wars, storms of the city and fortresses, there was tithe. Who fought? The authors of the new chronology, Fomenko and Nosovsky, answered this question in an unconventional way: they believe that these were internal wars between the Russians and the containers of Russia, on the one hand, and the Russians, the Cossacks and the containers of the Horde, on the other. Great Russia was split into two fronts, into two Rus - Siberian-pagan and European-Christian (de facto dual faith prevailed, the ancient Russian faith had not yet left, and became part of Russian Christianity), two hostile dynasties - Western and Eastern. The Eastern Russian Horde was that "Mongol horde" that beat Russian troops, stormed cities, and imposed tithes. She went down in history as the "Tatar yoke", "the evil Tatar region". The chronicles did not know the Mongols and Mongoloids, but the Russian chroniclers knew and wrote about the Tatars and "filthy" pagans.

Chronicles reported about the arrival of the "unknowable tongue", "pagan". Who was this "language" - the people? Where did the Horde come to Russia from? Huge territories from the Northern Black Sea coast through the Volga and the Southern Urals to Altai, Sayan and Mongolia itself, those territories that were inhabited by mythical "Mongols", called "Tartaria", actually belonged to the Scythian world, Great Scythia-Sarmatia. Long before the departure of the last wave of Indo-European Aryans in the 2nd millennium BC. BC, who left the Northern Black Sea region and the Southern Urals to Persia-Iran and India, the Indo-Europeans-Caucasians mastered the forest-steppe zone from the Carpathians and the Danube to the Sayan Mountains. They led a semi-nomadic lifestyle, were engaged in cattle breeding and agriculture. They used a horse tamed in the southern Russian steppes. They had developed production, crafts, and the cult of the warrior. They left behind many mounds with carts, rich utensils, weapons. They were the masters of a vast area from the Crimea (Tavro-Scythians-Rus) to the Pacific Ocean. They also dominated Mongolia, bringing there metallurgy, agriculture, and civilization as a whole. Local Mongoloids, who were still in the Stone Age, could not compete with the Caucasians. But they preserved the memory of them as giants, light-eyed and fair-haired warriors. Hence the fair-bearded, light-eyed Genghis Khan. The military elite, the nobility of Transbaikalia, Khakassia, Mongolia, were Indo-European. Only these clans of Scythians were the only real military force that created the world empire. The exodus of the Rus to the East and West led to a weakening of their ethno-core, later they dissolved in the Mongoloid masses of the East, but remained in legends and fair-haired and gray-eyed giants (a sign of Mongoloid - small stature).

Here are some of these pagan Rus (Scythian-Skete-Sclots) and came to North-Eastern and Southern Russia. Anthropologically, genetically, in their spiritual and material culture (mainly the Scythian "animal" style), the late Scythian-Rus were the same Rus as the Russians of Ryazan, Moscow, Novgorod or Kiev. Outwardly, they differed only in the style of clothing - the Scythian animal style, the dialect of the Russian language and faith - were "filthy" for the Christian chroniclers. Also, the Scythians were carriers of a concentrated military cult - the Cossacks. In general, the Horde was a Cossack that tried to establish their own order in all Russian lands.

The notorious "Mongol yoke" brought nothing to Russia. There are no words, no customs, no Mongoloid. The word “horde” itself is a distorted Russian word “glad, kind”. The princes of the Siberian Rus called themselves khans. But in Kievan Rus, for example, princes, for example, Vladimir or Yaroslav the Wise, were called kagans-kogans. The word “kogan-kohan” (abbreviation “khan-khan”) is not of Mongolian origin. This is a Russian word meaning "chosen", "beloved" (preserved in Little Russia as "kokhany" - "beloved"). It is not surprising that the Rus-Scythians easily found a common language with the Russian princes (for example, with Alexander Nevsky), boyars, the church, made relatives, fraternized, married off their daughters to both sides. Rus-Scythians were not strangers.

Thus, it was not the Mongoloids and not the Tatars (Bulgars) who came to Russia, but the only real force - the Rus-Scythians. Therefore, the three-century domination-"yoke" did not leave any anthropological changes in the population of Russia. The Horde themselves were Caucasian Rus, the eastern core of the Rus super-ethnos. Therefore, they naturally became part of the Russian people. The population of the Horde (Horde, Polovtsian, Alans, etc.) just at one moment became Russian.

The image of the Golden Horde as a completely alien hostile foreign state in which the "Mongols" reign supreme is false, created by the enemies of the Russian civilization and the people. There were no Mongol Mongolians in the Horde. There were Volga Bulgars ("Tatars"), there were Rus-Scythians. A huge empire "from sea to sea" was created by the pagan Rus of the Scythian Siberian world. A great power perished due to Islamization and Arabization. As soon as Islam took up in the Horde, a spiritual and religious confrontation began between parts of the empire, the division into "friends" and "aliens." As the Horde Empire degenerated, the "control center" of the northern civilization gradually moved to Moscow. Under Ivan the Terrible, Russia restored the unity of the Eurasian empire.

Recommended: