Export of Chinese medium and long-range air defense systems and their competition with Russian anti-aircraft systems

Export of Chinese medium and long-range air defense systems and their competition with Russian anti-aircraft systems
Export of Chinese medium and long-range air defense systems and their competition with Russian anti-aircraft systems
Anonim
Image

In the 21st century, the People's Republic of China, amid impressive economic successes, has become one of the most militarily powerful countries. Simultaneously with the reform of the PLA and equipping the ground forces with new equipment and weapons, much attention is paid to the development of high-tech combat arms: the fleet, aviation, nuclear deterrent forces and air defense.

With large-scale financial investments in research and training, China has created its own design and engineering school, capable of independently solving the problems of creating high-strength materials, rocket fuels, radar equipment and control systems. Recently, China has adopted new air defense systems, many of which have significant export potential.

The first Chinese anti-aircraft missile system to be exported was the HQ-2 (HongQi-2, Hongqi-2, Red Banner 2). The HQ-2 air defense system was created on the basis of the HQ-1 air defense system, which, in turn, was copied from the SA-75 Dvina air defense system. The main difference between the HQ-2 and the previous model was that the missile guidance station operated in the 6-centimeter frequency range (the HQ-1, like the CA-75, worked in the 10-centimeter range), which provided better noise immunity and higher guidance accuracy missiles.

The appearance of the HQ-2 air defense system was largely ensured by the successes of the Chinese intelligence, which managed to gain access to the Soviet S-75 Desna and C-75M Volga air defense systems delivered to Egypt. There is information that in exchange for Chinese weapons and a large sum in dollars, at least one SNR-75M guidance station and a batch of 13D and 20D anti-aircraft missiles were delivered to China.

Tests of the first version of the HQ-2 air defense system have been conducted since 1967 at the Jiuquan missile range. However, only after getting acquainted with the Soviet air defense systems and copying a number of technical solutions, the HQ-2 complex was able to demonstrate the characteristics that satisfied the Chinese military. The missile guidance station has undergone major changes. In addition to new electronic units with other vacuum tubes, more compact antennas appeared, which no longer required the use of cranes to roll up and deploy. In fact, Chinese specialists repeated the path traveled before by Soviet designers and used ready-made missiles from the HQ-1 complex, adapting new radio command equipment to them.

The HQ-2 air defense system was put into service and began to enter the troops in the first half of the 1970s. However, due to the "cultural revolution" and the general drop in the technological level of production caused by it, the reliability of the first HQ-2 complexes was low. It was possible to achieve acceptable reliability and catch up in basic characteristics with the S-75 Desna air defense system on the HQ-2A modification, which was put into service in 1978.

Export of Chinese medium and long-range air defense systems and their competition with Russian anti-aircraft systems

The Chinese clone of the Soviet "seventy-five" has long been the backbone of the PLA's air defense forces. Serial production of the HQ-2 air defense system continued until the end of the 1980s, and anti-aircraft missiles until the second half of the 1990s. In terms of its characteristics, the Chinese complex as a whole corresponded to the Soviet models with a 10-15-year delay.

Since there were no medium-range military complexes in the PRC, the PLA command demanded the creation of a highly mobile air defense system based on the HQ-2A.The main way to increase the mobility of the HQ-2V air defense system, which was put into service in 1986, was the introduction of the WXZ 204 self-propelled launcher, created on the basis of the Type 63 light tank.

Image

All other elements of the HQ-2V air defense system were towed. For this modification, a more anti-jamming guidance station and a missile with a launch range of up to 40 km and a minimum affected area of ​​7 km were developed.

Despite some improvement in characteristics, the HQ-2V air defense system cannot be considered a full-fledged military complex. First of all, this is due to the fact that it is impossible to move even on highways with a fully equipped rocket at high speed and for a considerable distance. As you know, anti-aircraft missiles with liquid-propellant rocket engines in a fueled state are quite delicate products for which significant shock and vibration loads are categorically contraindicated. Even minor mechanical influences can lead to loss of tightness of the tanks, which is fraught with the most sad consequences for the calculation. Therefore, placing a launcher of S-75 missiles on a tracked chassis does not make much sense. The presence of a self-propelled launcher, of course, somewhat reduces the deployment time, but the mobility of the complex as a whole does not dramatically increase.

Image

As a result, having suffered with self-propelled tracked launchers, the Chinese abandoned the mass production of the HQ-2B air defense system in favor of the HQ-2J, on which all elements were towed. According to information presented at international arms exhibitions, the probability of being hit by one missile in the absence of organized interference for the HQ-2J air defense system is 92%. Thanks to the introduction of the CHP SJ-202В with an additional target channel in the working sector of the guidance radar, it became possible to simultaneously fire on two targets with up to four missiles guided at them.

Image

In the PRC, more than 120 HQ-2 air defense systems of various modifications and about 5,000 missiles were built. More than 30 divisions have been exported to the Chinese allies. Chinese clones of "seventy-five" were supplied to Albania, Iran, North Korea, Pakistan and Sudan. The Chinese-made HQ-2 air defense systems took part in hostilities during the Sino-Vietnamese conflict in 1979 and 1984, and were also actively used by Iran during the Iran-Iraq war. Albania was the only NATO country where, until 2014, Chinese anti-aircraft systems with Soviet roots were in service.

Image

Currently, the HQ-2J air defense systems are operated in the DPRK and Pakistan. Iran has launched the production of Sayyad-1 missiles for Chinese-made complexes.

Image

The HQ-2 air defense system became the first Chinese medium-range air defense system to be exported. In the 1980s, this air defense system in the world arms market was to some extent a competitor to the widespread Soviet air defense system S-75. However, the deliveries of Chinese air defense systems were mainly carried out to countries that, for various reasons, could not receive Soviet weapons. This primarily concerns Albania and Pakistan. Iran and Sudan acquired the Chinese HQ-2 out of a desire to establish cooperation with the PRC, and North Korea received the HQ-2 air defense system free of charge as part of military assistance and operates them in parallel with the C-75.

Although the improvement of the HQ-2J air defense systems in service in the PRC continued in the 21st century, it became clear to specialists long ago that the complex, based on technical solutions half a century ago, has no particular prospects. The main disadvantage of the C-75 family of air defense systems and its Chinese clones is the use of liquid-propellant jet missiles, which use explosive and corrosive components, handling them requires special safety measures and protective equipment. Although the SJ-202В CHP has been introduced on some of the Chinese HQ-2J complexes, which allows you to simultaneously aim several missiles at two targets, in the anti-aircraft missile battalion on the launchers there are still six ready-to-use missiles. That, given the relatively small launch range for a missile of this dimension, by modern standards, it is completely insufficient.

In this regard, at the end of the 1970s of the last century, the development of a medium-range anti-aircraft missile system with solid-propellant missiles began in China, which was supposed to replace the outdated HQ-2. However, the creation of a solid-propellant anti-aircraft missile with the same range and altitude as that of the HQ-2 air defense missile system turned out to be a very difficult task. The first prototype, known as the KS-1, was presented to the general public in 1994. At the same time, in combination with solid-propellant radio command missiles, the SJ-202V missile guidance station was used, which was part of the modernized HQ-2J air defense system. However, the characteristics of this air defense system turned out to be lower than planned, and orders for it from the Chinese military did not follow.

Image

Only 30 years after the start of development, the Chinese anti-aircraft missile forces received the first HQ-12 (KS-1A) air defense systems. The main difference was a new multifunctional radar with AFAR N-200 with a detection range of up to 120 km and a missile with a semi-active radar seeker. The HQ-12 anti-aircraft missile division includes a missile detection and guidance radar, four mobile launchers, which have a total of 8 ready-to-use missiles and 6 transport-loading vehicles with 24 missiles.

Image

As part of the HQ-12 air defense system, an anti-aircraft missile weighing 900 kg is used, capable of hitting air targets at a range of 7-45 km. The height of the targets hit is 0.5-20 km. Maximum target speed - 750 m / s, overload - 5 g. The guidance station provides simultaneous shelling of three targets with six missiles. The improved modification of the KS-1C has a maximum firing range of up to 65 km, a defeat height of 25 km. As part of this complex, the SJ-212 multifunctional radar is used. Currently, the air defense forces of the PRC have at least 20 HQ-12 anti-aircraft batteries.

Although the HQ-12 air defense system no longer fully meets modern requirements, the buyers of this complex were Thailand (KS-1C) and Myanmar (KS-1A).

Image

It is reported that with the assistance of Chinese specialists in Myanmar, licensed production of the KS-1M modification with the locally produced GYD-1B SAM has been established. As of 2019, the Myanmar Armed Forces had six KS-1A batteries and one KS-1M battery, according to reference data.

Image

Thailand uses the KS-1C air defense system to protect the Surat Thani airbase, located near the Gulf of Thailand. This airbase hosts JAS-39C / D Gripen fighters and Saab 340 AEW & C AWACS aircraft. Initially, the Chinese FD-2000 long-range air defense system was the subject of negotiations, but financial constraints forced Thailand to purchase a less expensive air defense system.

In early August 2020, it became known that Serbia decided to purchase three batteries of the Chinese anti-aircraft complex FK-3, which is an export modification of the HQ-22 air defense system. In turn, the HQ-22 air defense system is an improved version of the HQ-12 with the SJ-231 radar and longer-range missiles.

Image

According to Chinese advertising materials, the HQ-22 air defense system is capable of fighting aerodynamic targets at a distance of more than 120 km. The height of the defeat is 50-27000 m. The firing range of the export version of the FK-3 does not exceed 100 kilometers, the altitude parameters are similar to that of the HQ-22 system. The battery, in which there are three self-propelled launchers, is capable of simultaneously firing twelve missiles at six targets.

It is known that in 2018 Serbia probed the ground regarding the possible delivery of S-400 air defense systems, but this information has not yet been officially confirmed by either Belgrade or Moscow. Apparently, the main reason for Serbia's acquisition of the Chinese FK-3 air defense system was its relatively low cost and the desire to avoid the imposition of American sanctions for the purchase of Russian weapons.

In the early 1990s, China was a major importer of Russian air defense systems. In 1993, the PRC received four divisional sets of S-300PMU air defense systems. The S-300PMU anti-aircraft missile system is an export version of the S-300PS with towed launchers. In terms of firing range and the number of targets fired at the same time, the S-300PMU air defense system was many times superior to the Chinese HQ-2J air defense system.An important factor was that the 5V55R solid-propellant missiles did not require maintenance for 10 years. Control firing at the "Site No. 72" training ground in the desert region of Gansu province in northwestern China made a great impression on the Chinese military leadership, after which it was decided to sign a new contract. In 1994, another Russian-Chinese agreement was signed for the purchase of 8 divisions of the improved S-300PMU-1 (export version of the S-300PM air defense system).

Image

In 2003, China expressed its intention to purchase the advanced anti-aircraft systems S-300PMU-2 (export version of the S-300PM2 air defense system). The first divisions were delivered to the customer in 2007. With the adoption of the S-300PMU-2, the PLA's air defense forces received limited capabilities to intercept operational-tactical ballistic missiles at a range of up to 40 km.

Image

According to data published in open sources, the PRC delivered: 4 S-300PMU missiles, 8 S-300PMU-1 missiles and 12 S-300PMU-2 missiles. Moreover, each divisional kit included 6 launchers. In total, China acquired 24 S-300PMU / PMU-1 / PMU-2 divisions with 144 launchers. Taking into account the fact that the assigned resource of the S-300PMU is 25 years, the first "three hundred" delivered to the PRC should have already completed their life cycle. The production of missiles of the 5V55 (V-500) family ceased more than 15 years ago, and the guaranteed shelf life in a sealed TPK is 10 years. Taking into account the fact that China did not apply for refurbishment and extension of the service life of the S-300PMU air defense system, four divisions received in 1993 with a high degree of probability have already been removed from combat duty. However, taking into account the pragmatism of the Chinese, it can be assumed that the radar systems supplied with the S-300PMU air defense systems will be used together with other Russian or Chinese-made anti-aircraft systems. The 36D6 combat mode radar and the 5N66M low-altitude detector installed on a universal mobile tower, with timely routine maintenance, can be operated for about 10 more years.

In April 2015, it became known that China and Russia signed a contract for the purchase of S-400 systems. At the beginning of 2020, information was published that Russia had fulfilled its obligations under the contract for the supply of two regimental sets (4 zrdn) of S-400 air defense systems to the PRC. Apparently, we are talking about self-propelled launchers, radar equipment, mobile command posts, power and auxiliary equipment. In July 2020, Sohu reported that Russia had delivered the ordered anti-aircraft missiles in an incomplete volume. Formally, this was due to the difficulties caused by the outbreak of coronavirus infection.

In a number of media outlets in the past, they wrote that the Russian S-400 air defense systems should replace the S-300PMU that have served their time. This is partly true, but it should be understood that at the time of the delivery of the first modification of the "300" to China, the PLA had nothing better than the Chinese version of the S-75 air defense system at its disposal. More than a quarter of a century has passed since then, and the PRC has long created its own highly effective medium and long-range anti-aircraft missile systems. It is quite obvious that the purchase of four S-400 divisions (which is very little by Chinese standards) is mainly related to the desire to get acquainted in detail with modern Russian air defense systems.

Almost immediately after the S-300PMU appeared at the disposal of the PLA air defense forces, work began in the PRC to create its own air defense system of the same class. However, one should not think that long-range anti-aircraft missile systems with solid-propellant missiles were an absolutely unknown topic for Chinese specialists. By the end of the 80s, there were developments in China for effective formulations of solid rocket fuel, and cooperation with Western firms made it possible to promote electronics. Chinese intelligence made a significant contribution. In the West, it is generally accepted that when creating the HQ-9 air defense system, a lot was borrowed from the MIM-104 Patriot long-range anti-aircraft complex.So, American experts write about the similarity of the multifunctional Chinese radar HT-233 with the AN / MPQ-53, which is part of the Patriot air defense system. At the same time, there is no doubt that a number of technical solutions were spotted by the designers of the China Academy of Defense Technology in the Soviet S-300P system. In the first modification of the HQ-9 air defense system, command-guided missiles with radar sighting through the missile were used. Correction commands are transmitted to the missile board via a two-way radio channel by a radar for illumination and guidance. The same scheme was applied to the 5V55R missiles delivered to the PRC together with the S-300PMU.

Image

The Chinese leadership spared no resources to create its own long-range anti-aircraft system, and in 1997, the first pre-production model was presented to the general public. Officially, the characteristics of the HQ-9 air defense system were not announced. Apparently, initially, the HQ-9 was inferior in its characteristics to the S-300PMU-1 / PMU-2 air defense systems purchased in Russia.

Image

In the early 2000s, during aerospace shows and weapons exhibitions, the characteristics of the export version of the FD-2000, which uses an anti-aircraft missile weighing 1300 kg, with a warhead mass of 180 kg, were announced. Firing range: 6-120 km (for the HQ-9A modification - up to 200 km). Altitude reach: 500-25000 m. The maximum missile speed is 4.2 M. According to the developer, the system is capable of intercepting ballistic missiles at a range of up to 25 km. The deployment time from the march is about 6 minutes, the reaction time is 12-15 seconds.

Currently, the improvement of the HQ-9 air defense system is actively continuing. In addition to the modernized anti-aircraft system HQ-9A, which was put into service in 2001 and is being built in series, it is known about the tests of the HQ-9B with extended anti-missile properties, which allows intercepting ballistic missiles with a firing range of up to 500 km. This anti-aircraft system, tested in 2006, uses infrared-guided missiles at the end of the trajectory. The HQ-9C model uses an extended-range missile defense system with an active radar seeker. Also, a missile was introduced into the ammunition, aiming at a source of radar radiation, which is designed to combat AWACS and electronic warfare aircraft. Chinese representatives stated that thanks to the use of high-speed processors, the data processing speed and the issuance of guidance commands on modern modifications have increased several times compared to the first model HQ-9. According to information published by the official Chinese media, during the range firing, the Chinese HQ-9C / V air defense systems demonstrated capabilities that are not inferior to the Russian S-300PMU-2 anti-aircraft missile system.

According to information published in the United States, obtained by radio and satellite reconnaissance means, in 2020, the PLA air defense forces have at least 20 HQ-9 air defense battalions. However, no breakdown by modification is provided. Western experts believe that the anti-aircraft systems built over the past 10-12 years are currently in operation. The PRC states that thanks to the progress achieved in the creation of new materials and alloys, the development of compact high-speed electronics and solid rocket fuel with high energy characteristics, Chinese specialists have managed to create and launch into serial production an anti-aircraft missile system that meets the highest standards. Of course, if the latest modifications of the HQ-9 air defense system were superior in their characteristics to the S-400, then the contract for the purchase of the Russian system would never have been concluded. At the same time, it should be recognized that very significant investments in research and training, while actively copying advanced foreign developments, have made it possible to create a number of modern Chinese anti-aircraft missile systems.

In addition to saturating the PLA anti-aircraft missile units with modern equipment and weapons, Chinese air defense systems are actively moving to the foreign market. The FD-2000 system was actively talked about in 2013, when this export model of the HQ-9 air defense system unexpectedly became the winner in a tender announced by Turkey.All manufacturers of long-range air defense systems took part in the T-LORAMIDS (Turkish Long Range Air And Missile Defense System) competition. Applications were submitted by the European consortium Eurosam with SAMP / T air defense systems (with the Aster 30 Block 1 missile defense system), the alliance of American companies Lockheed Martin and Raytheon (a combination of PAC-2 GMT and PAC-3), Rosoboronexport with the S-300VM Antey-2500 air defense system »And the China Precision Machinery Import-Export Corporation (CPMIEC) with the FD-2000 system.

Apparently, a very attractive price became the guarantee of victory for the Chinese FD-2000 air defense system (export version of the HQ-9). At the time of summing up the results of the tender, the cost of 12 divisions was $ 3.44 billion. At the same time, the United States offered Turkey 12 Patriot anti-aircraft batteries for $ 7.8 billion. However, in 2015, the results of the tender were actually canceled, and the competition was restarted. The Turkish side did not give official explanations on this matter. A number of sources say that, in addition to pressure from the United States, the reason for the refusal of the deal was the reluctance of the PRC to provide a license for the production of key elements of the system and anti-aircraft missiles. Apparently, Turkey hoped, with the help of China, to enter the elite club of manufacturers of modern air defense and missile defense systems.

However, this failure did not discourage Chinese importers. It is known that the buyers of the export modifications of the HQ-9 air defense system were Morocco (4 mark), Uzbekistan (1 mark) and Algeria (4 mark). Venezuela and Turkmenistan have been actively interested in Chinese long-range systems in the past. But after Caracas received a loan of two divisions of the S-300VM Antey-2500 air defense missile systems, negotiations with Beijing on this topic were terminated. The situation with Turkmenistan is not clear. A number of sources claim that this country has acquired two divisions, which are intended to replace the outdated S-200VM long-range air defense systems. But there is no official confirmation of the delivery of the HQ-9 air defense system to Ashgabat.

During the IDEAS 2014 arms exhibition, Pakistani representatives announced the purchase by Islamabad of three LY-80 air defense missile systems and eight IBIS-150 radars worth $ 265.77 million. In 2015, information on the purchase of three more LY-80 batteries was announced. Armament experts believe that new mobile anti-aircraft systems should replace the outdated Chinese-made HQ-2J air defense systems in Pakistan and strengthen the Pakistani air defense capabilities in a possible confrontation with India.

Image

The LY-80 anti-aircraft missile system is an export version of the Chinese HQ-16A air defense system. In March 2017, Pakistani representatives announced that all delivered LY-80 air defense systems are ready to be on alert. In January 2019, during the two-week military exercises "Al-Bayza", a training and control launch of the LY-80 missile was carried out.

Image

The piquancy of the situation lies in the fact that when creating the HQ-16 air defense system, Russian developments were used on anti-aircraft complexes of the Buk family. China first recognized the existence of the HQ-16 in 2011. The serial modification, in which the identified shortcomings were eliminated based on the results of military tests, received the designation HQ-16A.

Image

The anti-aircraft missile used in the HQ-16A externally has much in common with the 9M38M1 missile defense system, and it also uses a semi-active radar guidance system, but at the same time, a vertical missile launch is implemented in the Chinese air defense system. All elements of the HQ-16A are located on a wheeled chassis, and this complex, by all indications, belongs to the object air defense system and is adapted to carry long combat duty in a stationary position.

According to information published in open sources, the HQ-16 air defense system originally had a firing range of up to 40 km. A rocket weighing 615 kg and a length of 5.2 m after launch accelerates to 1200 m / s. The serial HQ-16A air defense system can intercept an air target flying at an altitude of 15 m to 18 km. The probability of hitting one SAM for cruise missiles flying at an altitude of 50 meters at a speed of 300 m / s is 0.6, for a MiG-21 type target at the same speed and an altitude of 3-7 km - 0.85. -16V maximum launch range for subsonic targets flying in the altitude range of 7-12 km, increased to 70 km.The battery of the HQ-16A air defense missile system includes an illumination and missile guidance station and 4 self-propelled launchers. Each launcher has 6 ready-to-use anti-aircraft missiles. Thus, the total ammunition load of the anti-aircraft battalion is 72 missiles. The operations of the anti-aircraft batteries are controlled from the divisional command post, where information is received from the IBIS-150 three-dimensional all-round radar.

Image

Mobile radar with HEADLIGHTS IBIS-150 is capable of seeing a fighter-type target at a range of 140 km and an altitude of up to 20 km. The radar IBIS-150 can detect up to 144 and track up to 48 targets simultaneously. The guidance station of the HQ-16A air defense missile system is capable of tracking targets at a distance of up to 80 km, simultaneously tracking 6 targets and firing at 4 of them, aiming two missiles at each. In total, the division has three fire batteries. Foreign observers note that conceptually the HQ-16 air defense system resembles the Russian S-350 medium-range complex or the South Korean KM-SAM.

In 2016, the HQ-16V air defense system with an increased firing range was presented. Also in the Chinese media published information that for use as part of the HQ-16 family of air defense systems, a missile defense system with an increased body diameter has been developed. Due to this, the accelerating characteristics of the rocket were increased, and the maximum range of destruction of aerodynamic targets was brought to 120 km. According to the US Department of Defense, at least 5 divisions of the HQ-16A / B air defense system can be deployed in the PRC as of 2020. Currently, the Chinese military, without taking into account the outdated HQ-2J air defense systems, has about 120 medium and long-range anti-aircraft systems, which is not much less than the number of systems of a similar purpose available in Russia.

From all of the above, it follows that the Chinese industry is able to provide the PLA with the entire line of medium and long-range anti-aircraft missile systems. In addition, in recent years, China has begun to actively compete in the global arms market with Russia in the segment of anti-aircraft systems. For our country, the situation is aggravated by the fact that the buyers of Chinese air defense systems for the most part in the past were focused on Soviet-style weapons, and, as a rule, for one reason or another, they were deprived of the opportunity to acquire modern anti-aircraft missile systems manufactured in the USA or NATO countries.

Popular by topic