Social protection in tsarist Russia: various directions

Social protection in tsarist Russia: various directions
Social protection in tsarist Russia: various directions

Video: Social protection in tsarist Russia: various directions

Video: Social protection in tsarist Russia: various directions
Video: The Russian Revolution - OverSimplified (Part 1) 2024, December
Anonim
Social protection in tsarist Russia: various directions
Social protection in tsarist Russia: various directions

Charity in pre-revolutionary Russia. There was another very important component of charity in tsarist Russia - the fight against hunger. So, 1891 turned out to be a terrible crop failure for Russia. Nizhny Novgorod, Simbirsk, Saratov, Ufa, Penza, Tula, Kazan, Orenburg, Tambov, Ryazan, Voronezh and Vyatka provinces have suffered greatly.

In view of this disaster, the government organized the supply of winter seeds to the needy population to ensure the future harvest. The Office of the Holy Synod and the Russian Red Cross Society have been actively involved in this. In many provinces affected by crop failure, including Penza, provincial committees were created to collect donations for the benefit of the population affected by crop failure.

"Vedomosti of the Penza Diocesan Committee" testifies that the sums in favor of the victims of the poor harvest were received in the period from September 16 to October 15, 1891. It is noteworthy that the funds came not only from Penza benefactors.

1. Sums received from the St. Petersburg Diocesan Committee 3 thousand rubles, the Don Diocesan Committee 182 rubles, the Moscow Diocesan Committee 2 thousand rubles, Astrakhan - 94 rubles, Vladimirsky - 500 rubles, Yaroslavsky - 238 rubles;

2. Collected during church services in plates and mugs at churches 234 rubles 61 kopecks;

3. Donations received from persons outside the Penza province: from the wife of Senator M. P. Shakhova 25 rubles, from A. N. Pleshcheev 499 rubles 37 kopecks;

4. Sums donated by His Grace, the Governor of Penza and individuals living in Penza, nobles, merchants, persons of other classes and various institutions are 2,039 rubles 94 kopecks.

And in total, until October 15, 1891, donations were received in favor of the victims of the crop failure 12,549 rubles 92 kopecks.

Of these, it was spent:

1. Issued to the Penza City Mayor N. T. Evstifeev for the purchase of 1,200 poods of rye for distribution to the needy residents of the Penza province who suffered from a poor harvest 1,098 rubles;

Issued to the treasurer of the Penza Bishops' House, Hieromonk Nifont for payment to the office of the Syzran-Vyazemskaya railway, for 11 poods sent 20 pounds of rye rusks, 7 rubles 24 kopecks.

A total of 1.105 rubles and 24 kopecks were spent”.

The total funds received at the disposal of the Executive Food Committee in the period from July 21 to October 15, 1891 were 1,168 rubles. For the maintenance of the city public free canteen 448 rubles 9 kopecks. In addition to monetary donations, there were also food donations, which from December 1 to 15, 1891 amounted to: flour 831 pounds 2 pounds, peas 50 pounds, from the merchant Krasilnikov 493 pounds of flour.

We must not forget about such a purely military direction of pre-revolutionary charity as helping the wounded. The development of this direction was strongly influenced by the Russo-Turkish War, which began in 1877. Penza, for example, took 349 wounded to charity hospitals. Archival documents show that

“The patients were supplied with medicines from the pharmacy located at the zemstvo hospital, while food was received from the hospital kitchen …

The Red Cross hospitals, both in the eyes of the whole society and, according to the opinions of the persons specially sent to examine them, stood in all respects above the military hospitals.

The content in them is excellent, the care of the sick is excellent, the military discipline is not violated in any way, and the patients behaved impeccably."

It is important that at the request of the military, the local government of the society gave them benefits.

For example, at the request of Pavel Petrovich Arisov, a retired corporal of the 213rd Infantry Company, a peasant of the Penza province from the village of Koromal, he was assigned an allowance for the purchase of a cow, because

"…NS. Arisov participated in the Russian-Turkish war and fell ill: a disease of the left hand, the lower jaw of the right side, ear ache on the right side and noise in the head, and also suffers from eyes, is not capable of physical labor, the family consists of their wife and three young children, is in extremely poor condition and cannot buy money for a cow by his labor."

Now imagine what a cow is in the then peasantry? It was not for nothing that they called her “Mother Nurse”. And this peasant got it.

The government's attitude to … the intensive enrichment of the monasteries was very interesting, which even caused him displeasure! The government believed that in the presence of significant funds, monasteries should donate a certain part of them to charitable needs. Thus, it would be possible to reduce the costs of the state treasury. And to show that the monks are trying by all means to bring relief to the people. It is a very logical, and I would say, quite modern judgment, although it took place long before 1917.

Thus, Penza monasteries, which were considered far from prosperous, in 1894 possessed land plots in the amount of 10,000 dessiatines, and the capital of many monasteries exceeded 25,000 rubles. In this regard, the ecclesiastical department demanded that the monasteries urgently fulfill the following tasks in the field of social protection:

1. Provide shelter to all the disadvantaged.

2. Set up orphanages.

3. To cede part of the premises for the elderly, often deprived of shelter and a piece of bread.

4. Establish hospitals and patient rooms, etc.

According to the definition of the Synod of August 21, 1891, the richer monasteries and churches should give cash benefits from their funds in favor of the needy and not stop feeding the poor.

Also, the Bishop of Penza made the following proposal for the consistory:

“In the name of Christ the Savior, who even miraculously nourished the hungry and commanded us to nourish the hungry, invite men and women to monasteries:

a) where the feeding of the strange and the poor would not stop and not reduce those, but, on the contrary, expand;

b) regardless of this, admit 5 boys to male monasteries, and 5 girls to female monasteries, in addition to those that already exist, mainly from orphans and children of the clergy."

This provision was binding. And it was sent to all the monasteries of the Penza province.

Fulfilling this provision, during the year the abbots of the monasteries sent reports to the consistory, according to which 28 boys, 77 girls and 11 homeless old women were accepted for maintenance. The total number of people living off the monasteries was 116. Children were taught the necessary knowledge. In addition, free canteens were opened in the monasteries, in which up to 500 people were fed.

For example, 20 people were fed in the monastery dining rooms of the Penza Trinity Convent. In the Paraskevo-Ascension nunnery - from 50 to 90. In the Mokshansk Kazan nunnery - everyone comes. In the Nizhnelomovsky Assumption Convent - 10 people. In Kerensky Tikhvinsky there are 90 people. There are 30 people in the Kovyliai Trinity Community. In the Chufarovsky Trinity Convent - 50 people.

In monasteries, the number of people who were fed free of charge was as follows. In the Penza Transfiguration Monastery - 30 people; in Nizhnelomovskiy Kazan - 10 people; in Narovchatsky Trinity-Scanovoe - from 20 to 40 people; in Krasnoslobodsky Spaso-Preobrazhensky Vyasskaya Vladimirskaya desert - everyone who comes.

Now let's imagine how many needy people were fed in this way in monasteries. all over Russia … And the numbers are not small at all.

So what? With the closure of monasteries and churches, did the Soviet state begin to feed all these people?

Don't make me laugh …

It was simply impossible to plug such a "hole" in the early years of Soviet power. Subsequently, all funds were spent on industrialization, collectivization, the army and the navy. So our people had to simply forget about such feeding. They were not organized even during the famine of the early 1930s.

In the cause of charity, the monasteries received some support from the Diocesan Committee. Such support went depending on the income of the monastery and on how many needy charitable institutions were opened in them.

For example, the Paraskevo-Voznesensky convent received an allowance of 488 poods of flour annually. The Nizhnelomovsky Assumption Convent had a dining room for 10 people. Subsequently (under the influence of the Diocesan Committee) it was expanded to 50 people, and an allowance of 240 poods of flour was also provided.

Among the monasteries, only one Penza Transfiguration Monastery in the amount of 145 poods of flour received an allowance. In the monastery, 30 people were constantly fed, and they received only 1.5 pounds (a little more than 600 grams) of flour per person and nothing more. That is, they fed them bread and stew, but that's all. And bread was not given in abundance. However, if a person did not have any food at all, then this was of help to him.

The next activity of the monasteries was the creation of shelters, hospitals and almshouses.

So, there was a practice of living in monasteries of a small number of crippled, paralyzed and other "weak" people. As a rule, they lived as novices, but did not obey. Also, monks and novices who, due to old age or illness, could not benefit the monastery, were freed from obedience and lived on the full support of the monastery.

So, in 1881 in the "Bulletin of the monastics of the Krasnoslobodsky Assumption Convent" it was reported:

“There were those dismissed from obedience due to old age and poor health: nuns - 5; cassock novices - 6; sloppy novices - 4; living on the test - 10.

In Krasnoslobodsky Trinity Convent, 8 people were released from obedience (without explanation).

In 1900, the number of non-obedient residents of the monastery increased. In the Penza Trinity Convent, 41 people did not obey. There are 32 people in the Kerensky Tikhvin Monastery. There are 44 women in Krasnoslobodsky Uspenskoye. In Krasnoslobodsky Troitsky, there are 26 women. In the Narovchatsky Trinity-Scan for men - 7 people. There are 19 women in the Mokshanskoye Kazan women's.

It should be noted that the monks with great zeal provided spiritual assistance (to pray, serve a panikhida, donate something from cult accessories), but when it came to financial assistance, various problems arose here.

By the way, some help was rendered to the students as well. Charity scholarships have been established for the best students. By 1913, 32 such scholarships were established in the amount of 200-300 rubles each.

By the way, in the same Penza State University today such scholarships are also established, as well as rector's grants to students for particularly interesting research. And these are really interesting developments of students (I was present at their consideration).

So you need to understand that the system of assistance to those in need in tsarist Russia differed from the Soviet one, first of all, in its social character.

In the USSR, all aid was provided by the state.

The public was left with the opportunity to show compassion, perhaps by giving some old woman 10 kopecks. No patronage, no sponsorship and private charity, no philanthropy - none of this happened. Everything was run by the state.

And in some ways it was good, and in others it was bad. The system was inflexible.

But today we have all the same types of charitable assistance that were in tsarist Russia. Plus the state system of rendering assistance to those in need.

Perhaps only now we have come to the optimal combination of both private and public.

Some may want to deepen their knowledge of this topic. So here is a list of references, including dissertation research:

However, this is not all.

And we will tell you about one interesting aspect of protecting the poor population of the Russian Empire.

Recommended: