The project of a heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T

Table of contents:

The project of a heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T
The project of a heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T

Video: The project of a heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T

Video: The project of a heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T
Video: THE FATE OF PRESIDENT TRUMP: MALHAMA - Imran Hosein Animated 2024, November
Anonim

Frequently used abbreviations and abbreviations in the article:

BTR - armored personnel carrier;

TBTR - heavy armored personnel carrier;

DBTR - two-link armored personnel carrier;

PU - launcher;

DU - remotely controlled installation;

MTO - engine-transmission department;

EMT - electromechanical transmission.

The project of a heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T
The project of a heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T

Photo 1. Russian heavy armored personnel carrier BTR-T

Image
Image

Photo 2. Russian two-link transporter DT-30PM

Inspired by the publications posted on the Courage website, I also decided to try my hand at proposing a concept for a promising armored vehicle. Since I am very interested in the two-link layout of armored vehicles (in particular, proposed by R. Ulanov), I tried to portray it as an alternative two-link heavy armored personnel carrier based on the chassis of the Russian T-55 (-54) tank. Please do not judge very harshly.

1. INTRODUCTION

The combat vehicle proposed by the author with the code name DBTR-T (Two-Link Armored Personnel Carrier - Heavy) can be considered as one of the promising alternative options for modernizing / converting old T-55 (-54) tanks into heavy tracked armored personnel carriers. (At one time, T-55 and T-54 tanks were produced in a fairly large number - about 95,000 units, so this chassis is the most affordable). An example of such a realized modernization is the Russian heavy armored personnel carrier BTR-T, which still exists in a single copy (photo 1).

BTR-T has clear advantages in armor protection over light armored personnel carriers. Its main disadvantages are the small number of troops and the inability to dismount the troops through the aft doors, which limits the use of the BTR-T.

It is theoretically possible to eliminate these shortcomings on the BTR-T due to the front placement of the MTO, but this will only solve the issue of the possibility of a safer dismounting of the landing force, the number of which will still be insufficient. And the conversion of a classic tank chassis into a platform with a front MTO position is more like creating a heavy armored personnel carrier practically from scratch.

On the one hand, the draft model of the DBTR-T proposed by the author is devoid of the main disadvantages of the BTR-T, on the other hand, it is incorrect to fully compare these machines because of their main difference - the number of links: the DBTR-T has two of them, the BTR-T has one.

The "relative" of the DBTR-T in terms of the number of links is the two-link all-terrain vehicle DT-30 "Vityaz" (photo 2), well-known for its super-cross-country ability, although its purpose is completely different.

Therefore, I will try to compare the characteristics of the DBTR-T with similar characteristics of the BTR-T, and also, in principle, justify the creation of such a machine, while its cost will be equal to the cost of three BTR-T, and maybe more …

Note

The two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T (pictures and text) proposed by the author is a sketch of the author's work, which does not claim any exact technical and tactical correspondence. The author is not a specialist in this field.

2. PURPOSE

DBTR-T is a highly protected off-road armored personnel carrier with armor protection that is not inferior to that of the BTR-T, but with almost twice the number of crew - 13 people. The landing party has the ability to leave flight number 2 of the vehicle through the rear doors and upper hatches.

Due to the two-link design, the DBT-T should significantly surpass all existing heavy tracked armored personnel carriers in terms of cross-country ability and functionality. The DBTR-T base is universal and can be used to create a whole family of two-link vehicles with increased security and cross-country ability.

Image
Image

Figure 1. Heavy two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T, appearance

3. COMPARISON OF BTR-T and DBTR-T

Comparative technical characteristics of the existing heavy armored personnel carrier BTR-T and the proposed by the author DBTR-T:

<td mass, tons

<td 5

<td (28 + 32)

<td crew, pers.<engine td

<td / B-55U

<td / 620

<td 1

<td 8

<td / 5

<td / 50

<td travel along the highway, km

<td 8

<td 8-1, 5 (maybe more)

<td ditch, m

<td 7

<td 5 (maybe more)

<td ford without OPVT / with OPVT, m

<td 4/5

<td 4/5

<td ground pressure, kgf / sq. cm

<td 86

<td 8

<td x 30mm 2A42

<td x 30mm 2A72

<td machine gun:

<td x 7.62mm PKT

<td x 7.62mm PKT;

2 х 7, 62-mm directional remote control PKT

<td (ammo)

<td PU ATGM (2 ATGM)

<td PU ATGM

<td frontal armor in homogeneous armor equivalent, -mm equiv.

<td colspan = 2 less than 600

<td protection

<td colspan = 2 "Contact-5"

<td landing

<td top hatches

<td hatches and aft doors

<td dimension, -mm:

4. COMPARISON OF DBTR-T WITH FOREIGN HEAVY APC

Similar heavy armored personnel carriers have been actively used by the Israeli army since the late 1980s. The number of the first TBTR "Akhzarit", created on the basis of captured T-55 tanks, according to various sources, ranges from 500 to 1000 pieces. In addition to the Akhzarit, Israel has two more TBTR models in service: the 51-ton Puma based on the Centurion tank and the 60-ton Namer based on the Mk4 Merkava (photo 3). The creation by Israel of a new, more expensive and protected TBTR "Namer" based on their most modern tank, once again confirms both the value and effectiveness of these armored personnel carriers in the army, and the value of the lives of the crews of these vehicles for their leadership.

<td "Name"

Israel

<td release

<td g.

<td mass, t

<td 10

<td 8

<td 3

<td x 30mm AP +

2 x 7, 62-mm machine guns

<td x 7.62mm remote control machine gun

<td x 12.7 mm remote control machine gun / or:

1 х 40 mm AG or

1 x 30mm AP

<td weapons

<td x 7.62 mm forward machine gun

<td x 7, 62mm machine gun

<td x 7.62mm machine gun:

1 x 60mm mortar

<td ATGM

<td pcs

Image
Image

Photo 3. Israeli heavy armored personnel carrier "Namer"

Comparative data in the table show that the presumptive characteristics of DBTR-T are at the level of one of the world's most protected TBTR "Namer". The alternative DBTR-T is inferior to the Israeli vehicle in armor protection (especially in the upper and side hull projections), but surpasses it in cross-country ability, armament and functionality.

Chasing the booking level of the Namer in the two-link version of the DBTR is not possible, since the Namer, with its length of almost 7.5 m, already has a mass of 60 tons, and a similar booking of the 11-meter DBTR-T will weigh it down at least to 80 tons.

When simulating the DBTR-T, the author set the upper limit for the mass of the vehicle at 60 tons. This is the mass that the standard engine of the T-90SM tank should pull, taking into account the reduction in maximum speed from 60 to 50 km / h.

5. MODIFICATIONS DBTR-T

Consider the theoretically possible options for the DBTR-T, which could potentially be in demand in the army:

Israel

4000 mm

2500 mm

<td x 7, 62-mm course PKT (2 x 1000 rounds);

2 х12, 7-mm DU NSVT (900 rounds / 6 magazines).

<td x 7, 62-mm course PKT (2 x 1000 rounds);

2 x 30 mm AP 2A72 (2 x 300 rounds);

2 x 7.62 mm paired PKT (2 x 1000 rounds);

2 PU ATGM

<td x 7, 62-mm course PKT (2 x 1000 rounds);

1 x 37 mm AP 2A11 (40-45 mm AP in the future);

1 x 7.62mm twin PKT;

1 x 40mm twin AG;

4 ATGM "Attack"

<td x 12.7 mm DU NSVT.

<td x 12.7 mm DU NSVT.

<td x 12.7 mm DU NSVT.

<td weapons

Image
Image

Figure 2. Modifications of the DBTR-T

All of the above machines differ from each other only in link # 2. Link # 1 remains practically unchanged in all modifications, which increases the unification of these alternative machines. In the versions of DBTR-TR, BREM and KShM course 7, 62-mm machine guns are removed from the fenders of chassis No. 1, instead of them one or two 12, 7-mm NSVT machine guns are installed (standard commander's ZPU tanks T-64 and T-80) … The replacement of machine guns is due to the impossibility of course machine guns to provide all-round protection of the machine, which can be provided by tank ZPUs with fully circular rotation.

Next, we will briefly consider two options for possible power plants. The proposed transmission is electromechanical (EMT), however, realizing its complexity and high cost, the DBTR-T layout is drawn in such a way that both purely mechanical and electromechanical transmissions can be used.

6. WEAPON

Link No. 1 in the variant DBTR-T / T1 and T2.

The armament of link number 1 in the combat models of the DBTR consists of two course 7, 62-mm PKT machine guns, they are remotely controlled by two operators. An important issue will be the angles of horizontal guidance of machine guns, so that they provide a good firing zone, protecting to the maximum not only the frontal projection, but also the side one. Ammunition approximately consists of two tapes of 1000 rounds each.

The location of the machine guns on above the tracked shelves is due to the location of the armament of link number 2, which has a circular rotation.

Theoretically, it would be correct to create universal remote-controlled installations that can be armed with both 7.62-mm PKT and 30-mm AGS-17D, as done on the Terminator-1 BMPT, only with large guidance angles.

The advantages of such weapons: large ammunition load in the 1st tape (1000 rounds);

Disadvantages: limited aiming angles.

Image
Image

Photo 4. Anti-aircraft machine gun caliber 12, 7-mm

Link # 1 in other versions. Link number 1 in the "auxiliary" modifications of the DBTR-T is armed with a standard tank anti-aircraft machine gun (ZPU) of 12, 7-mm caliber (photo 4).

It is supposed to use standard machine-gun installations from T-64A and T-80 tanks, since they allow the operator to fire from a machine gun without sticking out of the car. The machine gun mount has an electromechanical drive and provides horizontal circular guidance in the sector of 360 degrees and horizontal guidance in the range from -15 to +85 degrees. The installation has day and night sights, there is no two-plane stabilizer. The firing range of the machine gun is 1500 m, the ammunition load is 3 boxes of 150 rounds for each machine gun.

The author chose the ZPU machine gun for reasons of crew security, since to fire from the anti-aircraft machine gun of the T-72 tank, the shooter must protrude from the hatch.

On link number 1, one or two ZPUs can be installed above the gunners' hatches. The advantages of such weapons: excellent aiming angles; disadvantages: limited ammunition of 150 rounds.

Link No. 2 is the basic model of DBTR-T. This modification of the link can be used both as an armored personnel carrier and as a combat vehicle for flamethrowers. Given the absence of loopholes in the side armor of the second link of the vehicle, two commander's turrets of T-64/80 tanks are mounted on its roof, which rotate in a circular manner. The turrets are equipped with standard NSVT-12, 7 machine guns. The estimated ammunition load is 4 boxes per machine gun (1 on the machine gun, 3 in the troop compartment).

DBTR-T in the basic configuration provides simultaneous destruction of 4 different targets. According to this indicator, it surpasses the BMP-3, BMD-3/4 and BMPT Terminator-1. In the rear doors of the troop compartment, there are loopholes covered with a lid for firing from personal weapons in the direction of the stern.

Image
Image

Photo 5. One of the BMPT prototypes with two cannon mounts

Link # 2 combat model DBTR-T1. The flight has more powerful armament, consisting of two independent 30-mm cannon installations with paired 7, 62-mm PKT machine guns. On the right (in the direction of travel) gun mount mounted launcher for two ATGM. The cannon mounts are completely borrowed from the BMPT prototype of the 2nd modification (photo 5).

Why was this weapon chosen? The compact dimensions of the links required to increase the maneuverability of the vehicle (the total length of each link is 5000 mm) does not allow, simultaneously with the landing, to place in link No. 2 the fighting compartment of a two-man turret with more powerful weapons, for example, with a 57-mm S-60 cannon or "twin" from 100 mm 2A70 and 30 mm 2A72. In addition, a two-man turret should have powerful armor protection at the level of hull protection, which will inevitably weigh down the turret itself and the vehicle as a whole.

Unlike the two-man manned turret, the armament complex of the experienced BMPT with the code name No. 2 can provide several advantages at once:

+ additional protection for the roof of the troop compartment at the location of the weapons;

+ two different targets hit at the same time, for example, if the DBTR-T comes under simultaneous fire from two opposite sides;

+ the ability to hit one target (or a cluster of targets) from 2 cannons and 2 machine guns at the same time;

+ in case of failure of one weapon, there is a second;

+ the armament taken out to the outside reduces the gas contamination of the troop compartment.

Disadvantages of this option:

- cannons overlap each other at certain angles of rotation, - the lack of a modern LMS and limited capabilities in the fight against highly protected targets (tanks, bunkers, bunkers, etc.).

Image
Image

Figure 3. Modification of the DBTR-T1 with two combat modules from the BMPT prototype

Due to its powerful armor, the DBTR-T1, if necessary, can be used as a full-fledged BMPT, or accompany tanks while simultaneously performing the tasks of an armored personnel carrier and an BMPT. According to its armament, the DBTR-T1 can fully replace two BMP-2 infantry vehicles or two BMD-2 infantry vehicles.

Link # 2 combat model DBTR-T2. A promising weapon system.

In this case, the author provides for the installation of a fully automatic turret, which will not "eat up" the useful volume of the troop compartment. The tower is controlled by the commander and the operator, who sit “permanently” under the tower and receive information on the monitors. The armament of such a module consists of a 37-mm 2A11 anti-aircraft gun from the Yenisei ZSU with an air-cooled barrel and, accordingly, a lower rate of fire (200-300 rounds / min). The cannon is fed by two bands. The 7, 62-mm PKT machine gun and the 40-mm AGS grenade launcher are paired with the cannon.

Why 37mm caliber? It is believed that for promising artillery systems 30-mm is no longer enough, for 57-mm you need a voluminous turret compartment. The author considers the 37-mm "golden mean", or rather the "temporary" middle, while there is no automatic cannon of 40-45-mm caliber.

Even in its present form, a 37 mm HE shell has almost twice the mass of a 30 mm HE shell. In addition, according to various information - 35 … 37-mm minimum caliber, which is already advisable to equip with a remote fuse.

The gain of a 37-mm BPS in front of a 30-mm projectile in the thickness of penetrated armor is noticeable only at a distance of up to 1000 m.

A complex of guided weapons BMPT "Terminator-2" of four missiles "Attack-T" is used as a guided weapon.

Image
Image

Figure 4. Modification of the DBTR-T2 with a promising combat module

The advantages of such weapons are: a modern weapon system and control system, fully automatic ammunition, the ability to hit more complex targets such as enemy tanks and combat helicopters;

Disadvantages: bulky turret, which cannot be given a level of armor protection similar to the body of the armored personnel carrier itself. The tower would theoretically be highly vulnerable even to small-caliber automatic cannons.

7. TRANSMISSION DBTR-T

The considered type of transmission for DBTR-T is an electromechanical transmission. On the one hand, the use of such a transmission contradicts the basic concept of the DBTR-T - a budget and simple machine made on the basis of old T-55 tanks. On the other hand, its presence significantly expands the capabilities of the DBTR-T, as a result of which it should significantly surpass all existing heavy armored personnel carriers in cross-country ability, functionality and other performance indicators.

Image
Image

Figure 5. DBTR-T transmission diagram

Image
Image

Figure 6. Scheme of disassembly of the DBTR-T transmission

The transmission shown in the sketch is the same for links # 1 and # 2. On link number 1, it is installed "classically" in the rear of the MTO, instead of the old mechanical transmission of the T-55 tank. Link number 2 - a similar unit is installed in the front part, since there are two doors in the stern for dismounting the landing.

What advantages can an expensive EMT give to a two-link armored personnel carrier:

+ The ability to quickly uncouple the links for loading / unloading DBTR on road or rail transport.

The length of each disengaged link is no more than 6,000 mm. The decoupling is done by the crew. Both links independently enter platforms / tractors / wagons, etc. using a special power cable 10-15 m long, through which electricity is supplied from the leading link (No. 1) to the slave link (No. 2). To control the driven link, the driver-mechanic goes to link # 2, to the commander's place, where there are direct controls for the transmission of link # 2. At the moment of the maneuvers of the link No. 2, the link No. 1 works motionlessly in the mode of an electric power generator.

Image
Image

Figure 7. Loading links of DBTR-T on the railway platform

+ Evacuation of damaged links separately from difficult sections of the road (mountain roads, narrow streets, forest, etc.) due to the possibility of separating the links and the possibility of towing these links using an external generator or other DBTR-T.

+ Application of various types of engines without changing the transmission. The author proposed two versions of the DBTR-T with diesel engines of the "B" series of the T-90 tank and with gas turbines (GTE) of the T-80 tank.

In the future, in the course of the development and availability of alternative fuels and energy sources, it is possible to integrate a power unit based on fuel cells that generate electricity due to the chemical reaction of the fuel.

Image
Image

Figure 8. Three degrees of freedom of a two-link machine

+ "Flexibility" DBTR-T. As you know, two-link articulated machines have three degrees of freedom of movement relative to each other, respectively, and three ranges of restrictions on this movement. For example, a two-link conveyor DT-30P "Vityaz" (with a mechanical transmission - cardan shaft) has the following range of degrees of freedom of movement:

- angles of rotation of the links relative to the longitudinal axis: +/– 38 degrees;

- lifting angles of the links relative to each other: 35 degrees;

- angle of "twisting" of the links relative to each other: 8 degrees.

The absence of a rigid mechanical transmission of torque (cardan shaft) of the DBTR-T engine from link No. 1 to the transmission of link No. 2 may allow increasing the range of these limitations. Taking into account the functional purpose of the DBTR-T, the most important thing will be to increase the ranges of the angles of rotation of the links relative to the longitudinal axis (No. 1 in the diagram), in this case, the flexible power cable EMT will not be any limitation of this degree of freedom of movement. The sketch layout of the DBTR-T is drawn taking into account the maximum range of the link rotation angles: ± 45… 50 degrees.

+ Movement in reverse. The long length of the DBTR-T (11,000 mm) significantly limits its mobility in a combat situation in comparison with other combat vehicles (TBTR, BMPT, BMP), the hull length of which does not exceed 6,500-7,500 mm. Thus, the DBTR-T is almost completely deprived of the possibility of turning on mountain roads or on the streets of cities and towns.

This design flaw can be partially compensated for by increasing the maximum reverse speed to the maximum forward speed of 50 km / h (for comparison, the reverse speed of the BTR-T based on the T-55 is only 5 km / h).

Increasing the reverse speed for EMT DBTR-T does not present any particular difficulties. In the machine control department, a rear-view video monitor and a reverse video camera are provided, installed on the aft armor plate of link No. 2.

+ Traction characteristics. The main unique advantage of the DBTR-T is its increased cross-country ability with “heavy armor”.

Considering that all the most difficult obstacles (trenches, anti-tank ditches, walls, steep climbs, forest belt, off-road, soils with low bearing capacity, etc.) DBTR-T will overcome at low speed, it needs the highest torque at these low speeds. It is known that EMT provides high torque at low speeds, which is its main advantage.

From the history. Even during the Great Patriotic War, EMT was used on the heaviest tanks and self-propelled guns: it was serially installed on the German heavy self-propelled gun Ferdinand, weighing 68 tons, the prototype of the super-heavy Maus tank, weighing 180 tons, on the Soviet experimental heavy tank EKV (KV version -1) and the post-war heavy tank IS-6

+ Towing equipment. Taking into account the expected high cross-country characteristics of the DBTR-T, it will be entrusted with the task of towing damaged equipment or simply stuck combat vehicles in difficult terrain. In any case, towing will be done at low speed, which will also require high torque.

+ Possibility of connecting the 3rd link. For some modifications of the DBTR-T, it is theoretically possible to connect the 3rd lightweight link (similar to the DT-30P transporter).

If the DBTR-T will be used as a repair and recovery vehicle or a highly passable vehicle for transporting infantry and weapons / ammunition, it is possible to add link # 3 (with a similar transmission), which will be located between link # 1 and # 2.

8. POWER PLANT DBTR-T

The promising DBTR-T author proposes to create on the basis of the chassis of T-55 tanks with diesel engines of the "B" series, as a result, a power plant based on the engine of the "B" series is also assumed as a base power unit, only models: V-92S2F2, with a capacity 1130 hp, T-90SM tank.

Image
Image

Figure 9. Engine "standard" modification DBTR-T

The use of the most "top-end" version of the engine of this series increases the cost of the potential production of the DBTR-T, but it is this power that is necessary to ensure the high mobility of the rather heavy DBTR-T, the armor of which is equivalent to the tank one.

As an alternative power unit without a fundamental change in the transmission (in the case of using EMT), a gas turbine GTE, tank T-80 can be used. It is quite obvious that the use of a more expensive gas turbine can be justified only for special machines, for example, intended for permanent service in colder regions, where the "winter" advantages of a gas turbine engine are needed.

You can consider two modifications of the DBTR-T by type of power plant:

- "Standard" modification of the DBTR-T with the V-92 tank engine, with a capacity of 1130 hp;

- "Northern" modification with a gas turbine tank engine with a capacity of 1250-1400 hp.

Some engine parameters for comparison:

<td compressed air, from tug

<td 83

<td 83

<td fuel

Length:

Width:

Height:

Image
Image

Figure 10. Layout of MTO DBTR-T

It is likely that if the DBTR-T will be produced, it will be mainly in one more "budgetary" standard modification with the V-92S2F2 engine, since the problems associated with the simultaneous presence in the army of main tanks with fundamentally different power plants (T-80 and T- 72/90) are well known to all.

Another argument in favor of the B-92 may be its underutilized potential for increasing power. The use of improved fuel systems, modern air purification systems, a more efficient cooling system, additives that reduce friction, etc. could theoretically increase the power of this engine to 1200 hp. maybe more …

The V-92S2F2 engine is located transversely to the longitudinal axis of the hull (that is, similar to the T-44 / -54 / -55 / -62 / -72 / -90 tanks). The torque from the engine is transmitted to the electric generator through an intermediate transmission, similar to those used on the T-44 … 90 tanks. The power of the electric generator is 900 kW (1215 hp) in case of a possible boost of the diesel engine from 1130 hp. up to 1200 hp The total power of the 4 traction electric motors is 4 x 250 = 1000 kW, which is enough for both a standard T-90SM tank engine and a well-boosted (in the future) up to 1350 hp.

9. LAYOUT OF DBTR-T

Image
Image

Figure 11. Sectional link No. 1

Link number 1. To simplify the alteration of the original T-55 as much as possible, flight # 1 has a classic "tank" layout. The crew of three is in the front of the hull, its location is completely identical to the location of the crew of the BMPT "Terminator-1" (mechanic and two operators of the AGS). When reworking, the standard T-55 hull is shortened by 1 roller, the total length of the shortened hull is about 5000 mm. Here the reader's question is possible, "why shorten?", I will try to answer from my point of view:

“Initially, the author drew two articulated full-size 5-roller T-55 chassis - visually, the DBTR-T turned out to be very long and, accordingly, less maneuverable, and in terms of mass, with normal armor (the level of the BTR-T) its mass with such a length would be 70 -75 tons. It is clear that the "top" B-92 with 1130 hp. is unlikely to pull this colossus at a speed of more than 30-35 km / h … ".

Behind the control compartment there are internal fuel tanks, they are separated from the crew by a reinforced armored partition, which increases the rigidity of the control compartment, which, in fact, becomes similar to an armored capsule. The seats of the driver and two crew members are attached to the roof of the control compartment. For embarkation and disembarkation of the crew, there are three hatches in the roof of the hull and one emergency hatch in the bottom of the hull behind the driver's seat between the seats of the other two crew members.

External fuel tanks are located on the right and left fenders.

Internal fuel tanks are isolated from the crew and MTO by two armored partitions. In the MTO department there is a V-92S2F2 engine (transverse to the longitudinal axis of the body), an electric generator-starter is located parallel to the engine. The transfer of engine power to the generator is carried out through an intermediate gear ("guitar"), similar to that used on the T-54 … 90. The cooling fan is driven from the main generator shaft through a variator, which changes the fan impeller speed depending on the engine load. Behind the generator there is the 1st EMT block and the hydraulic system of the rotary link mechanism drives.

In all configurations of the DBTR-T, the NLD of link No. 1 contains a standard tank dump for self-entrenching. If necessary, it is planned to install a dozer blade with hydraulic drives.

To force water barriers along the bottom, it is planned to install two OPVT pipes - one at each link 1 and 2.

Image
Image

Figure 12. Layout of DBTR-T, top view

Link number 2. Link # 2 is also being redesigned from the hull of the T-55 tank, shortened to four road wheels per side (about 5000 mm long). The EMT block of the link # 2 is similar to the EMT block of the link # 1 only it is located in the front part of the link # 2. In the transmission compartment there is an auxiliary diesel generator with a capacity of 10-15 kW for autonomous power supply of two links. An air conditioner is supposed to be placed in the same department.

Behind the transmission compartment there is a combat and airborne compartment for 10 people. The height of link # 2 in the area of the BO and the troop compartment is slightly higher than link # 1.

The embarkation / disembarkation of the crew can be carried out through two aft doors and 4 upper hatches.

Crew seats are located along the sides (5 on each side) of the link and are attached to the roof of the compartment. There are no fuel tanks in the troop compartment. External fuel tanks are located on the fenders, fuel from them is transferred through flexible hoses to link No. 1.

Each link has an individual HLF, which differs in performance depending on the number of crew.

10. PROTECTION OF DBTR-T

Frontal projection. The durability of the DBTR armor will presumably be at the level of the existing Russian BTR-T. The resistance of the frontal armor against the KS is equivalent to 600 mm homogeneous armor (in the future - 1000 mm). VLD of the building of link No. 1 is "covered" by the built-in DZ "Contact-5". The hull NLD consists of a homogeneous 100-mm thick armor plate inclined at an angle of 55 degrees (similar to the T-55 tank) and additionally "covered" with a self-digging blade. Frontal armor of link No. 1 should provide protection against:

- cumulative rocket-propelled grenades RPG-7 grenade launcher;

- BPS guns of caliber 100-105 mm at a distance of 1000 m and more;

- BPS 57-mm cannon at any distance.

Unlike the BTR-T, the airborne troops of the new two-link armored personnel carrier DBTR-T are much better protected, since the entire frontal strike will be taken over by link No. 1, covering the troop compartment with its body. Even in the event of the defeat and failure of link number 1, the landing force can freely leave link number 2 and also fire from the weapons installed on it.

Side armor. The vehicle is protected from the sides by side armor, 80 mm thick (the thickness of the T-55 side armor), and removable side screens with DZ elements are additionally installed. The side armor complex must protect the DBTR-T board from:

- rocket-propelled grenades RPG-7 grenade launcher with a tandem cumulative warhead;

- armor-piercing shells (BPS) of automatic cannons of 30-37-mm caliber at any distance;

- BPS 57-mm cannon S-60 at a distance of 1000 m and more.

The distance between the side screens and the inner side armor plate is approximately 600-650 mm. External sealed fuel tanks are located between the removable screen and the main armor, providing additional protection from the COP.

Roof. Taking into account the fact that the control compartment of flight number 1 will be under the gunners' sights, the roof of the control compartment is additionally protected by DZ and the hatches have additional protection, similar to the protection of the hatches of the operators of the BMPT "Terminator-1" grenade launchers.

The roof of the troop compartment of flight # 2 is also additionally protected by DZ blocks.

The bottom in the area of the control compartment of link No. 1 is additionally reinforced with a welded armored box with an internal filler. Due to the increased reservation of the bottom in the area of the control compartment, the clearance is reduced by 100 mm. The internal armored partition with additional struts behind the seats of the driver and two crew members is a stiffener between the bottom and the roof of the hull, which increases the durability of the bottom in the area of separation of control from the explosive action of mines and land mines.

Stern. The thickness of the aft armor plates of links No. 1 and No. 2 is 45-mm, they provide protection against armor-piercing bullets of 14, 5-mm caliber fired "at close range" and BPS of 30-mm caliber at a distance of 500 m and beyond. The aft doors of the troop compartment are equipped with anti-cumulative lattice screens installed at a distance from the door for the premature firing of cumulative ammunition charges.

An automatic high-speed application software is installed in each link and operates independently of each other. Additional application software is located in the MTO link No. 1.

On the roofs of link number 1 and link number 2, sensors for warning about laser irradiation of the machine for automatic shooting of smoke grenades are installed.

The KAZ active protection system has not yet been provided by the author, since this is already a separate work.

New protection options. Finally, the new heavy tracked vehicle gets a unique opportunity to independently evacuate from shelling if the track breaks. In the event of damage and destruction of any of the tracks of link No. 1, the DBTR can independently evacuate at the expense of the working propeller of link No. 2, the transmission of which can remove up to 500 kW of power (675 hp) from the main engine-generator.

11. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF DBTR-T

Advantages:

+ high cross-country ability;

+ specific pressure at the level of 0.8 kgf / cm2 with a mass of 60 tons;

+ increased protection of the crew of flight # 1, which is actually located in a powerful armored capsule;

+ large troop compartment for 10 people;

+ the ability to dismount the troops through the rear doors;

+ powerful weapons;

+ versatility of the DBTR-T and the potential to create a family of machines based on it;

+ fuel and lubricants are removed from the control compartment and the troop compartment, which reduces the fire / explosion hazard of the vehicle;

Disadvantages:

- the high cost of the car (approximately 3 times more expensive than the BTR-T);

- large weight of the machine (60 tons);

- forward speed - 50 km / h, which can lead to lagging DBTRs on the march from other, faster combat vehicles;

- lack of side embrasures in link No. 2;

- the lack of a serially produced military version of the EMT, which could be used in the DBTR-T;

- the need to use the most powerful version of the "B" engine, which excludes the possibility of using old engines with a capacity of 580/620/780/840 and 1000 hp.

- the need for an additional cooling system for traction motors and a generator;

- a driver-mechanic and two gunners, when leaving the car through the upper hatches, they come under fire;

- the need to install two PPO systems, FVU and two air conditioners;

- side exhaust increases the visibility of the car.

Possible prospects for further modernization:

• installation of a promising X-shaped diesel generator with a capacity of 1200 hp;

• increasing the speed of movement up to 60-70 km / h due to the use of a more powerful engine;

• installation of KAZ to increase the security of the machine;

• installation of a promising 40-45-mm automatic cannon instead of the "temporary" 37-mm 2A11 for the DBTR-T2 model;

• the use of a simpler mechanical or hydromechanical transmission to reduce the cost and lighten the machine. At the same time, the DBTR-T will lose some advantages in cross-country ability, but also gain a couple of tons of weight, which can be used to increase armor or increase specific power at the same level of booking;

• Installation of two remote control machine-gun installations, caliber 5, 45–7, 62 mm, in the aft section of link No. 2 for additional protection of the vehicle from the sides.

12. CONCLUSION

At the end of this article, it would be correct to return once again to the question "does the army need a DBTR-T at the price of three BTR-T?", perhaps, is the main disadvantage of this car.

Other "pluses" / "minuses" of the car, not considered above:

+ One DBTR-T in terms of the number of troops (10 people instead of 5 people) is already equal to two BTR-T, and the landing has more chances to safely leave the car through the rear doors, which are not on the BTR-T.

+ The detonation of a DBTR-T on an anti-tank mine or a powerful land mine also gives the landing party much more chances of salvation - the main blow is taken by link # 1, which has no tight connection with link # 2.

+ In case of a rupture of a caterpillar on a mine, the DBTR can independently get out of the ambush in reverse, while saving the lives of the crew and the landing party.

+ Penetration of the frontal armor with modern ammunition will be disastrous for the entire crew of the BTR-T (7 people), while the amphibious compartment of the DBTR-T unit # 2 (10 people) will remain intact.

+ If we count by the criterion of crew survival (if such a criterion exists), it turns out:

With the vehicles fully equipped with crews and frontal defeat:

• one DBTR-T will be equal to 2, 33 BTR-T, if there are 3 people in the 1st link (7/3 = 2, 33);

• one DBTR-T will be equal to 3, 5! BTR-T, if there are 2 people in the 1st link (7/2 = 3, 5);

- In the case of lateral or stern damage to link No. 2 of the DBTR-T (10 people), the proportion, unfortunately, changes in the opposite direction: 1 DBTR-T = 0.7 BTR-T.

+ In terms of armament, the DBTR-T1 model fully surpasses two BTR-Ts at once, both in the number of barrels and in the number of targets simultaneously hit.

Despite the last point, it turns out that the above comparisons cannot fully justify the high cost and feasibility of the DBTR-T.

Perhaps the main trump card remains - one DBTR-T will pass where three or more BTR-T will not pass!

And if this argument becomes decisive, there is a chance that similar machines will still be developed and produced.

Recommended: