Something about economics
It is true that the economy of the USSR could not withstand the competition with the economy of the West, it is true. But a natural question arises: why did the USSR economy withstand and even defeat the European one during the great crisis of 1941-1945? Many well-known economists of the West directly write in their works that if Russia were tsarist, pre-revolutionary in the early 40s, it would have come to an end during the Nazi invasion.
The Soviet economy, both pre-war and during the bloody war, operated smoothly. Even the fact that part of the country was under occupation was not particularly reflected in her work. Western economic geniuses concluded that the Soviet planned economy was the most advanced in the world. And only she was able to withstand what she endured.
And suddenly there is such a paradox: the country is not at war with anyone, in fact it is flourishing, and the economy has collapsed! What's the matter? The point is that they helped her to fall apart. If so, then who? It is clear that those who ruled it. As the proverb says, the fish always rots from the head.
Only for some reason, under Joseph Vissarionovich, this "head" did not rot. As soon as a slight smell began, he immediately cut it off. And, probably, he did the right thing. Why did Stalin constantly clean the corps of his managers? Because he was forced to put specialists in key command posts, but, by Vedic definition, people from the first upper class. Such people can follow the idea if they are controlled. As soon as the control weakens, they begin to get lost and slide down to the material. Academician Porshnev called such people diffusers in his monograph on people of predatory species.
But Joseph Vissarionovich had no choice. There were very few unmarketable and incorruptible, indifferent to pleasures and power in post-revolutionary Russia. In addition, the Order, through its people, closely followed each of these. And whenever possible I tried to get rid of them. The masters of Western civilization in power in Soviet Russia needed venal lovers of pleasure, mean, envious, with criminal criminal manners. Such, which in ancient times were called slaves. These are easy to manage, especially through money and sex. Therefore, Stalin, talking with S. M. Kirov, later with Zhdanov and other people whom he trusted, often said: "We will find money, but where can we get people?"
"Where to get people?" - this was the main question of his whole life. Stalin needed managers. People from the second upper Vedic estate. Such, which can neither be bought, nor intimidated, nor deceived. But there were absolutely nothing like such people next to Joseph Vissarionovich. First, he lost Sergei Mironovich Kirov. True, fate sent him Andrei Zhdanov, but he was also soon killed. Beria remained faithful. Lavrenty Pavlovich worked for ten, was able to do a lot. He cleared the trash from the Soviet NKVD. Created border troops, elite divisions of the NKVD. He mastered the atomic project and raised the Soviet rocketry to a great height … And if there were ten or twenty such Berias? But, unfortunately, they were not. There were those who only pretended to try. In fact, these were lurking enemies like Suslov, Mikoyan, Kaganovich or Khrushchev.
Under Nikita Sergeevich, unprincipled careerists penetrated the economy. They were not eager to organize in the USSR such an economic growth that the West would become enviable and scary. In the Soviet Union, there was everything for economic development that could be: gigantic raw materials, a gold-backed ruble, a hardworking people who love their Motherland … … And most importantly, I would have thrown out of the business outright thieves, embezzlers, stupid careerists.
Under Stalin, the movement of rationalizers-inventors was developed in the USSR. What only these talented and educated people did not offer! And the state always went to meet them. But under Nikita Khrushchev, this whole movement immediately came to an end. Now thousands of amazing inventions and discoveries fell on the shelves of archives. No one was interested in them anymore. The question is why?
Because the West began to manipulate the Soviet economy through dummies. No, not direct agents of the special services, although, for sure, there were such. Mostly servants, who were promoted there by stupid party functionaries. All Soviet ministries were crammed with such non-people: below - in factories, factories and mines - quite normal people, above, in the ministries - only careerists and fools. How can this be explained? But in no way! A clear selection worked. And the owner conducted them from behind the cordon. Skillfully, intelligently and competently.
We wrote above that our people betrayed themselves for American rags. Why did it happen? Yes, because our Soviet economy pushed him to this. Of course, one should not discount the Soviet man in the street either. It is his fault that a huge tragedy has occurred.
Idea people are never susceptible to rags and trinkets. They create everything of their own, which is not at all worse, if not even better than what they want to buy them with. But let's get back to economics again.
In the 80s, when the first American jeans began to appear in the Union, many ordinary people praised them so much that one might think that they were special: “Wow, American ones! Made of the best fabric, but rivets, rivets !!! " What did you get caught on? On nonsense. Was our light industry really incapable of producing exactly the same fabric, or even better, even before the import of American trousers into the USSR? Of course she could. She could do everything: make rivets better than American ones, and leather patches. And the names of jeans, for example: "Siberia", "Russian North", "Golden-domed Moscow", "Veliky Novgorod", "Tashkent", etc. What stopped her? Or who interfered? It was possible with our resources to make such jeans that Americans would die of envy. For example, come up with some kind of bronze decoration or buckles with antler inlaid. Rogov in our north - mountains. And nobody needs them. But our industry did not react. But the same Americans could pay for our goods in currency. Now the question is: why didn't you react? There are many answers. And they will all be correct. And yet the main thing will remain in the shadows.
We mean a Soviet-made algorithm. The installation of the masters of Western civilization on making all goods from Soviet raw materials much worse than Western ones. Literally everything that our industry produced was carried out within the framework of this secret algorithm.
That is why industrial products produced under Stalin are still in use. Although by all standards, their term ended a long time ago. Under Joseph Vissarionovich, the Western attitude did not work for our goods. Let someone from the ministry try to force the director of the plant to make products worse than he can. Such a minister would immediately stand in line with the enemies of the people.
Is it fair or not? Of course it is. That is why, not trusting the ministers, Iosif Vissarionovich liked to communicate directly with the directors of factories.
That is why Stalin's "Victory", and hunting rifles "Izh-54", and refrigerators "ZIL", and much more are still working. Suffice it to recall that proud of their domestic hunting weapons, the British in the 60s gladly bought Soviet Izh-54 and were proud of the fact that they had Soviet double-barreled guns in their hands. This is what Soviet production should be like! All the best, most advanced and reliable! Our products are obliged to surpass the western ones. And the Soviet people have no other way. To make our products happy to be purchased by people of the most advanced countries in the world. Not to mention the citizens of Africa or Asia. Iosif Vissarionovich gave approximately the same directive to the Soviet economic machine. And with him everything went as it should.
But with the coming to power in the country of Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev, an algorithm of "Soviet production" began to work. Wherever you go, it’s bad everywhere. Everywhere is worse than in the West. Unless the military-industrial complex somehow held on. But Nikita Sergeevich Khrushchev also struck at him. First in the navy, and then in aviation. Now the question is: who followed the growth and development of our Soviet science and economy? It is clear that they were watching from abroad. And they followed closely. But it is not enough to follow, the Soviet economic power was skillfully restrained. Who did it?
It is clear that both our own special services and their allies in the gradual assassination of the USSR from the CIA are the two most powerful intelligence services in the world. As Stalin liked to say: "Cadres decide everything." So the cadres decided: to always put people at the head of our Soviet industry who knew how to live only for themselves and not for the people, and who perfectly understood what was required of them. It is for this reason that the Soviet Union very soon after the death of Stalin lost its leading positions in the world economy and gradually turned into a raw material appendage of the West. Under L. I. Brezhnev, the USSR finally got on the oil needle, which was exactly what was required.
Now let's move on to Yu. Andropov again. No one thought why the Andropov KGB needed to introduce internal intelligence in the USSR? Exactly the same as in a foreign western country? The answer lies on the surface, you just need to think a little: in order to closely monitor the directors of Soviet enterprises, so that they do not decide to introduce into production at their own peril and risk what local talented inventors can offer them. It is clear that the “guilty” director was immediately accused of squandering the people's money and was fired from his job. Replacing, naturally, with a goof. Such a total fooling in ministries and enterprises brought the Soviet economy to a real shock. And this was done not by some Western competitors, but by their own scoundrels, who, after the death of Stalin and Beria, with all their might, to please the West, hindered the development of the country.
It is clear that those KGB officials who were engaged in such cases received tidy sums through the web of cooperation of the special services. According to Coleman, the money came from the Rockefeller bank. It is possible that Western dollars were going on and on, only not to the KGB, but to some of the departments in the FSB.
Now let's get back to M. Gorbachev. Here A. Khinshtein and V. Medinsky wrote in their book that in the Soviet Union literally everything disappeared from stores in the 80s. They, these writers, are right. And so it was. But the question is, why did it disappear? And all at once: both essential goods and food?
A paradoxical situation arose: the factories were working with might and main, no one stopped them, and the shops were empty! Why? Here, either all products, including agricultural products, immediately went for a song to the Negroes in Africa, or they were piled up at the bases, and then systematically, declaring according to documents stale goods, they were cynically destroyed. Rather, both happened. An artificial deficit was created in the country.
It is understandable to blame the Soviet power for everything, and along with it the socialist system. At the same time, this was also done in order to push the Soviet man in the street to support the future collapse of the USSR. Sly, clever and mean.
The author will never forget how an acquaintance of the KGB in the winter of 1986 invited him to go with him for meat for dogs … 30 kilometers from the city. When he and the other arrived at the place, a terrible picture appeared before my eyes: a ravine littered with two-year-old bulls killed. To the author's question, where are so many bulls from and why they were all killed, the partner, sighing, replied that something terrible is happening in the country. Incomprehensible. And the bulls are all healthy, they were taken to the meat-packing plant, but they ended up in a ravine. We sawed off the hind legs of one bull with a hand saw. And we went to the city. “What I’m watching makes my hair stand on end,” the KGB man said goodbye to me. "Someone at the very top has gone mad."
This trip is not to be forgotten, it says a lot. It is clear that the special services in the 90s did their job, destroying the country's economy with all their might, and the "democratic" media broadcast both on the radio and on television that the Soviet economy could not stand the competition with the economic machine of the West. And the layman, not understanding what was really happening, swallowed everything.
Scarcity as a Lever of Social Governance
From the above, it is clear that the crisis of the socialist economy was artificially organized. And its organization began immediately after the death of Joseph Vissarionovich. First, the right people were dragged into key places in the economy. Then, thanks to them, a clumsy, dull and clumsy economy was built. And then everything went on a knurled track. On the one hand, this monster was ruled by stupid Marxists from the Kremlin, on the other - by smart and educated, but corrupt friends from the special services.
And there is no need to be hypocritical and lie that the socialist planned economy is a thousand times worse than the market, capitalist one. The question is who runs it. If you are honest patriots, then everything is fine, the economy is developing at a pace that no Western one has dreamed of. An example of this is the Stalinist era.
Even the liberals agree with this, but they always have an excuse that, they say, the Gulag helped Stalin. Slaves worked for the USSR in his time.
Yes, the GULAG camps supported themselves. This is true. But society did not have a significant profit from them. Sometimes they were economically and not profitable. Especially in the initial period of their organization.
The inmates needed shelter, clothing, and food. They had to be kept. Free people took care of themselves, but here everyone had to deal with the state.
And yet, the Soviet economy, if properly managed, developed at a colossal pace. It was destroyed and slowed down on purpose, and such a process was skillfully conducted because of the cordon. The Union was not overthrown by the war, now it was being killed in other ways. The question is: why was all this done?
On the one hand, it is understandable: to prove to the whole world that the socialist economy is not viable. But there was one more side of the coin: to create a continuous deficit in the country.
The lack of one, the other, the third - the most necessary and necessary - always causes irritation. The Russians were monotonously and tediously taught that the Union republics were to blame for everything. They, cursed, suck all the juices out of the RSFSR. Plus also the countries of the Warsaw bloc. What conclusion can be drawn from all this? Only one: down with both.
But in the union republics, the deficit is already controlled, it was not particularly spread there. When in Russia the shelves of shops, to put it mildly, looked empty, in Central Asia, Kazakhstan, the Baltic States and even in Ukraine, everything was far from the same. You could find almost everything on the shelves there. Why was this done? Some may say that the republics should not grumble. But there is one more "but". So that thousands of Russians begin to look for a new homeland where it is warmer and where everything is in stores.
Paradoxically, because of such an economic policy, part of the population of the richest republic in the USSR poured into the periphery. To Central Asia and Kazakhstan, to Moldova and the Baltic states.
Why was this done? On the one hand, in order to create tension in the union republics: why are the Russians going? It's cramped here and without them. And in general, they are occupiers and parasites. On the other hand, in order to relocate as much of the Russian ethnos as possible away from the Motherland.
The one who started all this knew the future very well. I knew that the USSR would not collapse today or tomorrow, and millions of Russian people would find themselves abroad. Of course, some of them will be able to return, but most of them, like the Kurds, finding themselves in a foreign land, will turn into second-class people and therefore an oppressed stratum of society. Essentially white slaves.
Clever? Simply brilliant! As a result, after the collapse of the USSR, the Russian ethnos lost 25 million compatriots. The loss correlates with the outcome of World War II.
