The Pentagon wants a new sea-based cruise missile

Table of contents:

The Pentagon wants a new sea-based cruise missile
The Pentagon wants a new sea-based cruise missile

Video: The Pentagon wants a new sea-based cruise missile

Video: The Pentagon wants a new sea-based cruise missile
Video: Why Germany Lost the Battle for North Africa (WW2 Documentary) 2024, November
Anonim
Image
Image

Discussions on the prospects of the nuclear missile sphere have once again begun in the United States. The State Department and the Defense Department exchanged views on a promising sea-launched cruise missile (SLCM) with nuclear weapons (Sea-Launched Cruise Missile Nuclear - SLCM-N). Perhaps now this concept will begin to be promoted - right up to adoption and use as another political argument.

Ministerial dialogue

On July 23, the Department of State published the report Strengthening Deterrence and Reducing Risks, Part II: The Sea-Launched Cruise Missile - Nuclear. The authors of the document reviewed the current military-political situation and the existing capabilities of the US armed forces. On the basis of such data, they confirmed the already known recommendation.

In a constantly changing world and growing international tension, as well as in connection with the confrontation with Russia and China, it is proposed to develop and supplement the US nuclear forces. To solve such a strategic task, several types of weapons can be used, incl. promising SLCM with a special warhead. Such weapons were first mentioned in the 2018 Nuclear Posture Review and have been regularly remembered since then.

The State Department recalls that products of this class were in service with the US Navy until 2010, but then they were abandoned due to the general reduction of nuclear forces. Meanwhile, Russia continued to build up its operational-tactical nuclear capabilities. Moscow is suspected of wanting to gain advantages in a hypothetical conflict through the use of such weapons. Non-strategic nuclear weapons can be used to end a regional conflict in their favor. In this regard, the Pentagon needs a symmetrical response.

Image
Image

In addition, Russia continues to create A2 / AD zones that can dramatically reduce the potential of the strategic component of the US Air Force. To counter such a threat, appropriate measures are required - one of them may be SLCM with deployment on ships and submarines.

On August 4, the US Department of Defense published its commentary on this topic. The note contained the most important quotes from the State Department report and some additional information. Pointing to all this, the Pentagon agreed on the need to create and deploy a promising nuclear cruise missile in the Navy.

However, such a dialogue between the ministries so far affects only the concept itself. The State Department and the Pentagon point to certain features of the weapon necessary to obtain the desired results, but there is no talk of creating a real model of speech yet. However, such processes can be started at any time.

Nuclear past

In the context of the promising SLCM-N, they recall another weapon that was removed from service many years ago - the BGM-109A Tomahawk Land Attack Missile - Nuclear (TLAM-N) cruise missile. The deployment of such weapons began in the first half of the eighties. Its carriers in different periods were destroyers, cruisers and battleships of various types, equipped with different launchers, as well as submarines of several projects.

The TLAM-N was a turbojet-powered cruise missile capable of subsonic flight at a range of up to 2,500 km. The combat load is a W80 type nuclear charge of variable power from 5 to 150 kt. With the help of onboard navigation aids, the rocket could go to a ground target with previously known coordinates.

Image
Image

The BGM-109A missile service lasted only a few years. In 1991, the US command, pointing to a thaw in international relations, proactively removed such SLCMs from duty and sent them for storage. They remained there until 2010, when an order was issued for the removal from service and the subsequent disposal of the remaining products.

Foggy future

Eight years after the official removal of TLAM-N from service in Washington, they again started talking about the need for such weapons in connection with the change in the strategic situation in the world. So far, the proposals of the Nuclear Policy Review have not moved beyond the discussions, but the situation may change in the near future.

A fundamental decision on the development and implementation of a promising SLCM can be made at any time. Moreover, the recent exchange of views between the State Department and the Ministry of Defense may hint at the fact that everything has already been decided - and all that remains is to issue the necessary orders and orders. In this case, real design work on a promising topic can start in the coming months.

In general, SLCM-N development can take two paths. The first is notable for its sufficient complexity, increased costs and time requirements, and also does not guarantee that the desired results will be obtained. This is a full-fledged research and development work at all stages, from the development of technical specifications to the launch of the series.

The Pentagon wants a new sea-based cruise missile
The Pentagon wants a new sea-based cruise missile

The second approach is to modernize the existing Tomahawk BGM-109 taking into account the experience of previous projects, incl. TLAM-N. The creation of such a nuclear missile based on the available components will be quite fast and simple - in fact, you only need to replace the conventional warhead with a special one and modify the software. At the same time, all the positive qualities of the original rocket will be preserved - but with them all the shortcomings will remain.

Military-political tool

Regardless of the approaches to its creation, a promising SLCM will become a rather convenient and flexible instrument of military policy and will give Washington some new opportunities and leverage. How realistic it is to achieve all the desired potential is a big question.

First of all, the SLCM-N is interesting in that the high command will have new weapons at its disposal, expanding the overall capabilities of the fleet. Ships and submarines will be able to solve additional tasks, both in the context of the projection of force and in a real conflict. In particular, the appearance in the region of ships with SLCM-N is considered as a workable means of deterring an enemy with conventional or nuclear forces.

TNW as a whole is of great interest to the US Army. Unlike strategic weapons, they are not actually limited by any international agreements. Such arsenals can be created and developed solely taking into account their own plans, without fear of anything other than simple criticism from abroad. SLCM-N follows this logic, and therefore the concept can be brought to a real project.

Image
Image

The United States has long feared that a potential adversary represented by Russia or the PRC in the course of a regional conflict could use tactical nuclear weapons. Due to the specific doctrine of the development and use of tactical nuclear weapons, the American army will not be able to respond to this in a timely manner. The emergence of the SLCM-N and possibly other prototypes of this kind will give the United States a tool to respond symmetrically to threats considered relevant.

However, the main task of new nuclear weapons, incl. A promising SLCM is precisely deterrence at the strategic and operational-tactical levels. The United States plans by all available means to exclude and prevent the use of nuclear weapons by a potential adversary. In this case, the hypothetical conflict will occur in a non-nuclear format. Washington believes that in such a war all the advantages remain with the American army.

The development of non-strategic nuclear forces of the United States may be interested in its allies. Some of them have tensions with their neighbors and there is a real or perceived risk of conflict. By enlisting US support with new sea-based "tools", these countries can feel more secure.

Answering a call

Thus, within a few years, the US Navy may receive weapons that are old in their concept and new in implementation with nuclear weapons, designed to solve a number of important tasks. It will pose a serious challenge to third countries, and they should take into account the current American plans and intentions.

We are talking about a sea-based cruise missile, which determines the ways of counteraction. So, to combat carriers, means of detecting and tracking ship formations, as well as anti-ship missile systems of all basing options, are needed. These funds will make it possible to disable the ships before the missiles are launched. After the launch of the SLCM-N, all the main means of air defense should begin to work - from long-range radar to anti-aircraft systems.

There is nothing fundamentally new in the methods and means of dealing with SLCM-N and its carriers. However, in this case, a special responsibility is assigned to the defense. Time will tell whether the likely adversaries of the United States will be able to take the necessary measures and defend themselves against the still non-existent sea-launched cruise missile.

Recommended: