Franz Adamovich Klintsevich - Deputy of the State Duma (United Russia faction), Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Defense Committee. In 1980 he graduated from the military-political tank-artillery school, in 2004 - from the Academy of the General Staff of the Russian Federation.
Surkov Vladislav Yurievich. Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. Served in the Soviet army in 1983-1985.
Dmitry Olegovich Rogozin - Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation. Just the Deputy Prime Minister …
The reader is probably already asking the question, why does the author begin the material by listing certain political figures of our country, and even in some peculiar form. Yes, just the above-mentioned Russian politicians are, let's say, persons involved in the "case" that, according to Russian law, in the near future, people who have not served in the Russian army may be banned from holding public positions within the framework of the civil service …
But here's the dilemma that looms: the initiator of this quite promising project was the very (indicated at the top of our list) deputy Klintsevich, who, judging by his biography, has a rather serious relationship to the country's Armed Forces. His aspirations are understandable. He defended his Motherland himself, then ended up in the civil service, and therefore he is ready to help others who have gone through the so-called school of life in a certain way at the legislative level. Like, he did not serve - you have nothing to do in the civil service.
But with regard to the other two Russian politicians on the list, things are getting more than confusing. Dmitry Rogozin, who, if you analyze his published biography, did not pay military duty to the Fatherland, immensely advocates for the initiative of Deputy Klintsevich. But Vladislav Surkov, who seems to know firsthand how to wind footcloths on his feet and everything like that, is categorically against this kind of initiative. These are the diametrically opposed views.
In particular, Surkov says that the Constitution of the Russian Federation regulates the right of equal access for citizens of the country to public service. Indeed, such words are in Article 31 (part 4). It turns out that if the initiative of Klintsevich and Deputy Prime Minister Rogozin is adopted, even on a purely hypothetical level, then it will be necessary to amend the Constitution, and this is still a precedent. With us, and so with the fundamental laws, and even more so with their implementation, it is not God knows how …
On the other hand, it is necessary to take care of increasing the prestige of military service. Recently, proposals for this kind of care have been received with enviable regularity: either to issue grants for training in universities, then to finally regulate the benefits for admission to these same universities, then to financially stimulate the family of a conscript. So the initiative that it is the people who have given their military duty to the country in which they live should have certain preferences for moving up the state career ladder has appeared. Indeed, certain barriers must be erected before those who evade the fulfillment of military duty. Simply put: as they are to the state, and the state to them …
The initiative is very sound.
But, as we know perfectly well, it is one thing to say a word about this kind of initiative, and another thing to bring this initiative to life. And the problem here is not even that you will have to amend the Constitution. After all, it is clear that such an initiative will need to be implemented, overcoming numerous corruption barriers. You can talk as much as you like about the fight against deviators, but in fact, there have been so many deviators in the country lately that their name is either a horde, or, forgive me, "army." And who will be able to prove that this gentleman is a deviator, but this one is simply suffering from flat feet, and therefore failed to serve the Motherland, is also a big question.
Taking into account how the draft medical commissions work for us, any dodger for a certain amount can easily turn out to be "slightly damaged" - and then look for this doctor who made such a conclusion. If everyone who has not served in the army needs to prohibit "appearing in the civil service", then a big buzz will be raised by people who, for example, really had health restrictions that do not prevent them from honestly working for the good of the Motherland in civilian life. sphere. Here is the same, for example, Rogozin - did not serve, and this not only does not prevent him from being in the cage of the top leaders of the state, but also to defend the idea of fighting deviators … Apparently, he himself is not deviating, but the people will demand proof, and this already, after all, interference with privacy …
In general, the logic in the project on building a state barrier for the draft deviators is certainly present, but again it is tempting to approach this impartial word as “corruption”. Someone, excuse me, will give someone a paw, and now he will be from the category of yesterday's deviators in the ranks of the ardent defenders of the Fatherland. I don’t want to look like a kind of “all-pervasive”, but, for some reason, as soon as a sufficiently sensible idea appears in the country, it immediately (even before the start of its implementation) falls into the grip of corruption and becomes, in fact, doomed in advance. At the same time, the worst thing is that everyone understands this perfectly, and therefore the same deviators now calmly look at the idea of fighting them, realizing that it is extremely difficult to implement it (the idea), as the classic said. They sit for themselves and further evade …
