Which cartridge is more effective. 7.62x39 versus 5.56x45

Table of contents:

Which cartridge is more effective. 7.62x39 versus 5.56x45
Which cartridge is more effective. 7.62x39 versus 5.56x45

Video: Which cartridge is more effective. 7.62x39 versus 5.56x45

Video: Which cartridge is more effective. 7.62x39 versus 5.56x45
Video: Reply of the Zaporozhian Cossacks to the Turkish Sultan 2024, May
Anonim
Image
Image

Even if you are not fond of firearms, then, most likely, you can still list a few common calibers. And if we narrow the circle down to long-barreled weapons, then for sure - two. The most widespread in the world are two cartridges for automatic weapons: 5, 56x45 mm and 7, 62x39 mm. The first of these is the standard NATO assault rifle cartridge, the second is inextricably linked to the famous AK-47 and its many clones and is even more widespread.

The armies of many countries around the world, as well as the police forces, rely on these two cartridges for their excellent performance, time-tested. The ammunition has won its place in the sun thanks to its good firing range, accuracy, and lethality. Moreover, each of these two cartridges has its own characteristics. In some ways one is better, in other ways the other. Disputes about which particular patron is more successful continue today, especially often heated discussions can be observed on the Internet. At the same time, one should not forget that it is very difficult to find the truth in such a dispute. In a real battle, much depends not so much on the cartridge itself, but on the shooter, his level of training and possession of the weapon, as well as on the weapon itself.

At the same time, the armies do not abandon both calibers, since the systems adopted for service are focused on solving different combat missions. If machine guns / assault rifles today are almost always produced in caliber 5, 56 (NATO) or 5, 45 (Soviet / Russian systems), then sniper weapons and machine guns are still presented in caliber 7, 62x51 (NATO) or 7, 62x54 (Russia). But now we will talk primarily about intermediate cartridges and their advantages and disadvantages.

When did the most common intermediate cartridges appear?

The most common intermediate cartridges in the world are 5, 56x45 mm and 7, 62x39 mm. The old man here is the Soviet intermediate cartridge 7, 62x39 mm, model 1943. This ammunition was developed during the Second World War, but was not used in combat conditions. The creation in the USSR of a 7.62-mm intermediate cartridge and its adoption into service opened up new perspectives in the design of various types of automatic weapons. The famous Kalashnikov assault rifle, AK-47, which was put into service in 1949, was created specifically for this cartridge. Together with the AK in the post-war years, the cartridge 7, 62x39 spread widely throughout the world. So much so that in the 1960s, the possibility of adopting it as an additional submachine gun cartridge in NATO countries was even seriously discussed.

Which cartridge is more effective. 7, 62x39 against 5, 56x45
Which cartridge is more effective. 7, 62x39 against 5, 56x45

However, it never came to that. Largely due to the appearance of an intermediate low-impulse cartridge 5, 56x45 mm. This cartridge was developed in the USA in 1959 and went into production in 1961. The cartridge was created on the basis of the existing.223 Remington hunting ammunition. As with the Kalashnikov assault rifle, the proliferation of ammunition was facilitated by the creation of effective small arms. It was under this cartridge that Eugene Stoner developed almost all of his small arms models, including the famous M16 assault rifle. In the 1970s, the cartridge began to be widely distributed in NATO countries and by the mid-1980s it became standard for all NATO countries.

The development of intermediate cartridges in the USSR and the USA was preceded by the same conclusions. Existing rifle cartridges were overly powerful for modern automatic weapons. At the same time, the standard NATO cartridge 7, 62x51 mm was recognized as too heavy, which directly affected the ammunition carried by the soldier. In the changed conditions of warfare, this was already unacceptable. In addition, intermediate cartridges ensured a reduction in the mass of the weapon itself, reduced recoil when firing, which provided a large effective range of firing in bursts.

Obviously, the 7.62mm round weighed more than the 5.56mm. At first glance, the difference is not that big: 16 grams versus 12 grams. However, in an ammunition load of 100 rounds, this already gave 400 grams of difference. And if we consider the standard gunner's ammunition of 8 magazines, the difference becomes even more noticeable, since the weight of the wearable ammunition has already grown by a kilogram. For long marches, this is already very important. That is why, by 1974, an intermediate low-impulse cartridge of 5, 45x39 mm caliber was also created in the USSR, which is distinguished by an even lower weight - 10 grams.

What are the pros and cons of cartridges 7, 62x39 and 5, 56x45

Both intermediate cartridges are widely used in armies around the world to this day. However, it is very difficult to determine which one is better for the average shooter (largely due to the bias of such assessments: in some cases it will be exclusively about the shooter's preferences). To avoid this, usually try to evaluate ammunition in three main categories: power, recoil and accuracy. It is easier to compare with these categories, since all three parameters can be easily assessed both theoretically and in practice.

Image
Image

The small-impulse intermediate cartridge 5, 56x45 mm, created later, has a number of undeniable advantages. His bullet is almost two times lighter than the bullet of cartridge 7, 62x39 mm. Therefore, even despite the increased flight speed, the recoil momentum was reduced. This had a positive effect on the accuracy of shooting from automatic weapons. The machine gun shook less corny when firing in bursts. For the shooter, it became more comfortable to fire, dispersion decreased, and, therefore, the likelihood of hitting a target increased.

Among other things, due to the higher speed of the bullet, the flatness of the trajectory improved. It is easier for a shooter who uses cartridges of 5, 56 mm to aim, since he has to make fewer adjustments for wind or altitude. This is especially important for long-range shooting. The average speed of a bullet of cartridge 7, 62x39 mm is 720 m / s, for a bullet of cartridge 5, 56x45 mm, this is already 1006 m / s. At a distance of 100 meters, there is still no difference in reducing the trajectory of a bullet for two cartridges, but already at a distance of 250 meters, the 7.62 mm bullet decreases by 40 cm. shot. At a distance of up to 250 meters, it practically does not decrease.

Despite all of the above, the most common machine gun cartridge on the planet is still the Soviet 7.62x39 mm, which was sold around the world thanks to the AK-47 machine gun and its numerous copies, both licensed and not so much. This ammunition also has its advantages. The first and most obvious is the weight of the bullet. Ammunition of this caliber is more preferable if you are firing at a target in a bulletproof vest. A heavy bullet retains energy much better at long distances, having a better striking and stopping effect.

The advantages of cartridges 7, 62x39 mm are also the lower probability of ricochet and much more stable overcoming of obstacles. The bullet confidently overcomes thickets, leaves, branches, while a 5, 56-mm bullet can seriously change the trajectory, meeting even a minor obstacle. What can we say, boards and bricks for 7.62 mm ammunition are often also quite surmountable obstacles. At the same time, if it hits the bone, such a bullet provides a more severe wound. On the other hand, low-impulse intermediate-caliber cartridges provide more severe wounds, falling into soft tissues.

Image
Image

The obvious disadvantages of cartridge 7, 62x39 mm include higher recoil when firing. The high recoil makes it difficult for the shooter to be able to accurately second and third shots, depending on the weapon he is using, as well as the very ability to fire efficiently and accurately in bursts. In turn, due to the flatter trajectory, low-impulse intermediate cartridges are considered easier for massive armies with a conscription system, when a large number of new soldiers must be constantly trained in shooting. This is not the last reason why the 5, 45 mm cartridge is still the most popular in Russia, although the military is discussing options for returning to the 7, 62 mm caliber or creating new ammunition.

If we sum up the results when comparing according to three main criteria, then everything is quite simple. The intermediate cartridge 7, 62x39 mm wins in power, but loses to the cartridge 5, 56x45 mm in accuracy and recoil. For the average shooter, when firing at long distances, the intermediate low-impulse cartridge 5, 56x45 mm, as well as its Russian counterpart 5, 45x39 mm, seem to be more preferable.

Recommended: