Ivan Okhlobystin: About Colt's right

Ivan Okhlobystin: About Colt's right
Ivan Okhlobystin: About Colt's right

Video: Ivan Okhlobystin: About Colt's right

Video: Ivan Okhlobystin: About Colt's right
Video: How Much Penetration Does a Tokarev Pistol Have? 😁💥#militarysurplus 2024, December
Anonim
Image
Image

"God created people, and Colonel Colt made them equal in rights"

At one time, I ran to my fill with all sorts of shooting pieces of iron, and therefore it is impossible to convict me of a romantic attachment to weapons. Which, however, does not at all affect my desire to at least partially own the situation. Otherwise, it does not work: I have children, I am a citizen and a believer. If I understand that the only way to save a child from Yevsyukov's bullet is to remove his brain from the TT, I should be able to do this. I firmly realize that I will immediately face criminal, civil and, most importantly, church courts, but the child must survive.

I allowed myself this emotional preamble to draw your attention to the open sabotage by the people's representatives of the issue of the right of their voters to defend themselves, of the right of citizens to have normal automatic weapons. One gets the feeling that the deputies are afraid of a just reprisal against themselves or consider their own voters to be an uncontrollable scum, devoid of any standards of morality and ethics. If this is so, then our civic duty is to warn the higher organizations about the internal enemy in the State Duma. If the higher organizations do not pay due attention to this, then it should be reasonable to assume that the President is in danger, and decide this issue independently.

More frequent mentions in the press of "distraught" owners of traumatic weapons. The Samarkand donkey understands that “all of a sudden” does not happen, that it was the same before, but the press was less interested. Why were the birds suddenly alarmed? Al little informational reasons? Or were they ordered to frighten from “above”? Prepare for tougher supervision and issuance of traumatic and smooth-bore? Maybe it is correct, but the people around me for the most part have such weapons for many years and do not indulge. Someone saved their lives, someone with this weapon twice after buying it in a tin can at a landfill shot. But so that with the foolishness … Dismiss!

There is no need to toughen up, we need to make it easier, as in the United States so adored by liberals 100 years ago. You just need to start up the entire registration procedure through the military registration and enlistment offices. At the same time, the statistics will become clear with the combat reserve. Russia - defended your mother? Get the paper. Go to the store and buy "Kalash with two zinc" legally.

As for the madmen and "batmen," putinka "enchanted", it is like the forces of nature. They usually do not need a silver inlaid collectible Browning for disgrace. The most terrible weapon is a piece of glass in a drunken fight, and a kitchen knife, of course, for a domestic "dismemberment".

But in fact, in this regard, I see one conclusion: disarming the people - you see, default is on the way, they are afraid of unrest "at the top", fermentation, "who is for Putin, who is for Medvedev?" and other ambiguities.

As a convinced "sovereign", I personally do not see much difference, but with the stubbornness of an idiot I continue to insist on my right to be able to defend my family with sensible weapons in my hands during a hypothetical turmoil.

Recommended: